New Media, 1740-1915
New Media, 1740-1915
复制标题
新媒体,1740-1915
DOI:
10.7551/mitpress/5001.001.0001
复制
发表时间:
2004
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Harlen Makemson
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Harlen Makemson
New Media, 1740-1915. Lisa Gitelman and Geoffrey B. Pingree, eds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003. 271 pp. $34.95 hbk. At times, it is hard to escape pronouncements-often repeated breathlessly in the media-about the ways the latest technology advances will change our lives irrevocably. The advance of new media seems relentless, its salubrious effects predestined, its perceived dangers outweighed by its ability to make our lives more convenient or its potential to break down long-standing prejudices. In recent years, a few books have studied the history of "new media" and have served as importan t correctives to the contemporary tendency to see the Internet and related technologies as never-before-seen wonders. Tom Standage's The Victorian Internet and Carolyn Marvin's When Old Technologies Were New are two notable examples of such books; New Media, 1740-1915 proposes to be another. If one is looking for case studies of successful media, he or she should look elsewhere; the book largely addresses media forms that survived just briefly. New Media explores how these forms were perceived in their infancy and shaped by the existing cultural and media landscape. The book adopts Marvin's approach which, in her words, seeks to discover how new technologies "negotiate power, authority, representation, and knowledge." The authors of the ten essays in this volume, part of a Media in Transition series, embrace this approach in often intriguing ways. Katherine Stubbs lays bare the fissures over gender roles by analyzing the littleknown genre of "telegraphic fiction" during the 1870s and 1880s. These novels and short stories written by telegraph operators were a reflection of the increasing hostility toward women in the field, who were beginning to dominate in numbers, if not influence. Authors portrayed female telegraph operators as incompetent at best, threats to the technology itself at worst, in tales often laden with sexual overtones. Not only does the essay effectively analyze the medium in its historical moment but reminds us that proclamations of technology leveling the playing field among constituent groups are often wrong. On one level, Laura Schiavo's essay about the stereoscope serves as a case study for how a new technology's reason for being can change for commercial interests. Charles Wheatstone's original device served a scientific purpose in better explaining the process of sight, demonstrating with simple diagrams that the mind would force two dissimilar two-dimensional elements into one three-dimensional image. …