One Among Many: Anaphoric One and Its Relationship With Numeral One.
One Among Many: Anaphoric One and Its Relationship With Numeral One.
复制标题
众多之一：照应一及其与数字一的关系。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Laura A. Michaelis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Goldberg;Laura A. Michaelis
在英语名词短语的句法分析中，一种使用了一种（例如，这是一个好的），并且在有关语言可学习性的辩论中，“单位替换”也很突出。但是，由于包括雷·杰克多夫（Ray Jackendoff）在内的一些敏锐的研究人员明确表示，这项工作的大部分是基于错误的前提。放弃图像的视图（一个）作为一种句法替代形式，使我们可以仔细研究一下单词的各种用途。在目前的工作中，我们研究了它作为基数（1）的用途，以便更好地理解其放置用途。像所有基数一样，1-ONE只能量化一个个体化的实体，并默认情况下提供无限期的读数。由于唯一的组合特性，基本数字违反了一致的确定词，量词，形容词或名词。一旦对基本数字（包括1个）的语义和分布得到赞赏，A-One的许多特性随之而来。我们声称1-ONE和A-ONE是不同的，但密切相关的词汇。当1-ONE出现没有名词（例如，拿一个）时，它几乎与A-One（例如，拿一个）无法区分 - 唯一的差异是解释性的（1-One to notground to not AN-ONE没有）和韵律（存在与不存在原发性重音）。虽然我们最终认为需要一个构造家族来描述出现的整个句法上下文，但拟议的网络通过允许其继承其大部分的句法和解释性约束来解释A-One的属性。 ，1个。
One anaphora (e.g., this is a good one) has been used as a key diagnostic in syntactic analyses of the English noun phrase, and "one-replacement" has also figured prominently in debates about the learnability of language. However, much of this work has been based on faulty premises, as a few perceptive researchers, including Ray Jackendoff, have made clear. Abandoning the view of anaphoric one (a-one) as a form of syntactic replacement allows us to take a fresh look at various uses of the word one. In the present work, we investigate its use as a cardinal number (1-one) in order to better understand its anaphoric use. Like all cardinal numbers, 1-one can only quantify an individuated entity and provides an indefinite reading by default. Owing to unique combinatoric properties, cardinal numbers defy consistent classification as determiners, quantifiers, adjectives, or nouns. Once the semantics and distribution of cardinal numbers, including 1-one, are appreciated, many properties of a-one follow with minimal stipulation. We claim that 1-one and a-one are distinct but very closely related lexemes. When 1-one appears without a noun (e.g., Take one), it is nearly indistinguishable from a-one (e.g., take one)-the only differences being interpretive (1-one foregrounds its cardinality while a-one does not) and prosodic (presence versus absence of primary accent). While we ultimately argue that a family of constructions is required to describe the full range of syntactic contexts in which one appears, the proposed network accounts for properties of a-one by allowing it to inherit most of its syntactic and interpretive constraints from its historical predecessor, 1-one.