Comparison of Conventional and Fuzzy Control of Indoor Air Quality in Buildings
Comparison of Conventional and Fuzzy Control of Indoor Air Quality in Buildings
复制标题
建筑物室内空气质量常规控制与模糊控制的比较
DOI：
10.3233/ifs-1996-4205
复制
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Michel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Dounis;M. Bruant;M. Santamouris;G. Guarracino;P. Michel
本文比较了自然通风建筑室内空气质量控制的各种技术：开-关、比例-积分-导数PID、比例-积分带死带PID和模糊控制。模糊控制器的控制系统是典型的双输入二氧化碳浓度及其时间导数，一输出窗开面积变化的系统。对两种不同的模糊控制器建模：一种基于Mamdani的极大极小推理，另一种采用Gupta的多变量结构。结果表明，模糊控制器和Pldb控制器比PID或ON-OFF控制器更适用。被控制参数的周期数，即窗口开度波动实际上要小得多。观察到两种模糊控制器之间的微小差异。
This article compares various techniques for the control of indoor air quality in a naturally ventilated building: ON-OFF, proportional-integral-derivative PID, proportional-integral with deadband PIdb, and fuzzy control. The control system for the fuzzy controllers is a typical two input carbon dioxide concentration and its time derivative, one output change in window opening area system. Two different fuzzy controllers are modeled: one based on Mamdani's max-min inference, and the other using Gupta's multivariable structure. The results show that the fuzzy controllers and the Pldb controller are much more suitable than the PID or the ON-OFF controllers. The number of cycles of the controlled parameter i.e., the window opening fluctuations is actually much smaller. Minor differences between the two fuzzy controllers are observed.