The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business
The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00743.x
复制
发表时间：
2012-12-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Bell, Stephen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bell, Stephen
贝尔斯蒂芬（2012）思想的力量：商业结构力量的观念塑造。《国际研究季刊》，doi：10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00743.x？(c)2012年国际研究协会现在人们普遍认为，关于企业结构性力量的经典论点过于结构主义。随后的研究集中在一系列不断扩大的独立变量上，这些变量决定了这种权力的可变性。本文扩展了这一研究传统，认为结构性权力理论没有充分关注政府行为者，通常是这种权力的目标。本文认为，通过政府和国家领导人构建的结构性权力的威胁感知的想法和概念化的过程可以是重要的调解这种权力。关于权力的文献通常认为，权力塑造思想和纪律的目标科目。本文修正了这一逻辑，认为目标主体的思想也可以塑造权力。论文的论点，然后基本上是建构主义的，但该文件扩展了这样的论点，坚持更大的作用，机构比往往发现在建构主义推理。
Bell, Stephen. (2012) The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business. International Studies Quarterly, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00743.x ?(c) 2012 International Studies Association It is now widely accepted that the classic arguments regarding the structural power of business are too structuralist. Subsequent research has focused on a widening array of independent variables that shape the variability of such power. This paper extends this research tradition, arguing that structural power theory has given insufficient attention to governmental actors, typically the targets of such power. The paper argues that ideas and the ideational processes through which government and state leaders construct threat perceptions regarding structural power can be important in mediating such power. The literature on power typically argues that power shapes ideas and disciplines target subjects. This paper revises this logic by arguing that the ideas of target subjects can also shape power. The papers arguments then are essentially constructivist, but the paper extends such arguments by insisting on a greater role for agency than is often found in constructivist reasoning.