Revisiting orientations in language planning: Problem, right, and resource as an analytical heuristic
Revisiting orientations in language planning: Problem, right, and resource as an analytical heuristic
复制标题
重新审视语言规划的方向：问题、权利和资源作为分析启发法
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
N. Hornberger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. Hult;N. Hornberger
1984年，理查德·鲁伊斯提出了语言规划的三个取向：语言作为问题、语言作为权利、语言作为资源。从那时起，这些方向变得更加强大，上升到语言政策和规划领域的范式水平。在本文中，我们重新鲁伊斯的取向。通过借鉴鲁伊斯自己的工作，以及其他学者的工作谁受到了他的启发，我们解开的想法与每个方向一致，以反映在应用程序的三个方向作为一个启发式的LPP。相反的批评，这三个方向不映射到政治现实的政策情况下，我们认为，它们是分析有用的客位概念，可以被研究人员用来指导演绎分析的价值观，出现在混乱的政策辩论和谈判和（潜在的）主位概念的情况下，当人们表达他们的语言信仰。
In 1984, Richard Ruiz set forth three orientations to language planning: language as problem, language as right, and language as resource. Since that time, the orientations have only become more powerful, rising to the level of paradigm in the field of language policy and planning (LPP). In this paper, we revisit Ruiz’s orientations. By drawing upon Ruiz’s own work as well as the work of other scholars who have been inspired by him, we unpack the ideas aligned with each orientation in order to reflect upon the application of the three orientations as a heuristic for LPP. In contrast to critiques that the three orientations do not map onto the political reality of policy situations, we argue that they are analytically useful as both etic concepts that can be used by researchers to guide deductive analysis about the values that emerge from messy policy debate and negotiation and as (latent) emic concepts in situations when people express their beliefs about language.