The Landscape of Clinical Trials Evaluating the Theranostic Role of PET Imaging in Oncology: Insights from an Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov Database.
The Landscape of Clinical Trials Evaluating the Theranostic Role of PET Imaging in Oncology: Insights from an Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov Database.
复制标题
作者:
Chen YP;Lv JW;Liu X;Zhang Y;Guo Y;Lin AH;Sun Y;Mao YP;Ma J
In the war on cancer marked by personalized medicine, positron emission tomography (PET)-based theranostic strategy is playing an increasingly important role. Well-designed clinical trials are of great significance for validating the PET applications and ensuring evidence-based cancer care. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive landscape of the characteristics of PET clinical trials using the substantial resource of ClinicalTrials.gov database. We identified 25,599 oncology trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov in the last ten-year period (October 2005-September 2015). They were systematically reviewed to validate classification into 519 PET trials and 25,080 other oncology trials used for comparison. We found that PET trials were predominantly phase 1-2 studies (86.2%) and were more likely to be single-arm (78.9% vs. 57.9%, P <0.001) using non-randomized assignment (90.1% vs. 66.7%, P <0.001) than other oncology trials. Furthermore, PET trials were small in scale, generally enrolling fewer than 100 participants (20.3% vs. 25.7% for other oncology trials, P = 0.014), which might be too small to detect a significant theranostic effect. The funding support from industry or National Institutes of Health shrunk over time (both decreased by about 5%), and PET trials were more likely to be conducted in only one region lacking international collaboration (97.0% vs. 89.3% for other oncology trials, P <0.001). These findings raise concerns that clinical trials evaluating PET imaging in oncology are not receiving the attention or efforts necessary to generate high-quality evidence. Advancing the clinical application of PET imaging will require a concerted effort to improve the quality of trials.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
--
作者:
Wei WX;Huang JJ;Li WY;Zhang X;Xia Y;Jiang WQ;Fan W;Li ZM
通讯作者:
Li ZM
影响因子:
5.6
作者:
Jauw YW;Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW;Hoekstra OS;Hendrikse NH;Vugts DJ;Zijlstra JM;Huisman MC;van Dongen GA
通讯作者:
van Dongen GA
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Kakkis ED;O'Donovan M;Cox G;Hayes M;Goodsaid F;Tandon PK;Furlong P;Boynton S;Bozic M;Orfali M;Thornton M
通讯作者:
Thornton M
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
Humbert, Olivier;Cochet, Alexandre;Fumoleau, Pierre
通讯作者:
Fumoleau, Pierre
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Anderson, Monique L.;Chiswell, Karen;Califf, Robert M.
通讯作者:
Califf, Robert M.