Evaluation of clinical research training programs using the clinical research appraisal inventory.
Evaluation of clinical research training programs using the clinical research appraisal inventory.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00229.x
复制
发表时间：
2010-10
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Fraser V
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lipira L;Jeffe DB;Krauss M;Garbutt J;Piccirillo J;Evanoff B;Fraser V
本研究的目的是测量临床研究自我效能的变化后，参加KL 2，博士后和博士前临床研究培训计划在华盛顿大学医学院。我们使用76项临床研究评估量表（CRAI）对项目参与者进行了调查。主成分分析（PCA）检查了CRAI的基本因素结构; Cronbach alpha测量了每个分量表和整体CRAI上项目的内部一致性。使用重复测量方差分析评估CRAI评分从基线到1年随访的变化。2006-2009年入组的所有29名KL 2、47名博士后和31名TL 1学者（平均年龄31.6岁，范围22-44岁; 59.6%为女性; 65.4%为白色）均完成了基线调查。在这些参与者中，22名KL 2，17名博士后和21名TL 1学者完成了为期1年的跟踪评估。主成分分析得到了一个7因子的解决方案，有69个项目（α> 0.849，每个子量表和69个项目CRAI）。1年随访时，在研究设计/数据分析（P=.016）、解释/报告/展示（P=.034）和总体CRAI（P=.050）的所有项目中均观察到显著改善。除了一个分量表外，所有项目之间均观察到差异（每个P<.05）。临床研究自我效能感在临床研究训练后一年有所增加。这种短期结果是否与长期临床研究生产力相关，需要进一步研究。
The purpose of this study was to measure change in clinical research self-efficacy after participating in KL2, Postdoctoral and Predoctoral clinical research training programs at Washington University School of Medicine. We surveyed program participants using a 76-item version of the Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory (CRAI). Principal components analysis (PCA) examined the CRAI's underlying factor structure; Cronbach alpha measured the internal consistency of items on each subscale and the overall CRAI. CRAI score changes from baseline to 1-year follow-up were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance. All 29 KL2, 47 Postdoctoral, and 31 TL1 scholars enrolled 2006-2009 (mean age 31.6 years, range 22-44; 59.6% female; 65.4 % white) completed baseline surveys. Of these participants, 22 KL2, 17 Postdoctoral and 21 TL1scholars completed the 1-year follow-up assessment. PCA resulted in a 7-factor solution with 69 items (alphas > .849 for each sub-scale and 69-item CRAI). Significant improvements at 1-year follow-up were observed across all programs for Study Design/Data Analysis (P=.016), Interpreting/Reporting/Presenting (P=.034), and overall CRAI (P=.050). Differences between programs were observed for all but one subscale (each P<.05). Clinical research self-efficacy increased one year after clinical research training. Whether this short-term outcome correlates with long-term clinical research productivity requires further study.