The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta-analytic review
The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta-analytic review
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00371.x
复制
发表时间：
2007-03-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Viswesvaran, Chockalingam
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Connolly, James J.;Kavanagh, Erin J.;Viswesvaran, Chockalingam
通过累积研究结果，检验了人格大五维度自我和观察者评定之间的收敛效度。自评系数α和观察者评分的评分者间可靠性的平均相关系数为0.46（N=6359，k=53），0.56（针对肥胖）（N=6754，k=58），情绪稳定性0.51（N=8000，k=55），外倾性0.62（N=7725，k=50），经验开放性0.59（N=5333，k=38）。结果表明，虽然有一个高度的结构重叠，自我和观察者的评级有很大的独特的方差。分析了调节剂效应。分析了熟人的持续时间（陌生人与近亲）以及观察者类型（同事与亲戚）。熟人有很大的调节作用，而观察员类型没有调节收敛水平。
The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of the Big Five dimensions of personality was examined by cumulating research findings across studies. The mean correlation corrected for coefficient alpha in self-ratings and inter-rater reliability in observer ratings was .46 for agreeableness (N=6359, k=53), .56 for conscientiousness (N=6754, k=58), .51 for emotional stability (N=8000, k=55), .62 for extraversion (N=7725, k=50), and .59 for openness to experience (N=5333, k=38). Results indicate that, although there is a high degree of construct overlap, both self and observer ratings have substantial unique variance. Moderator effects were analyzed. The duration of acquaintance (strangers vs close relatives) as well as observer type (peers at work vs relatives) were analyzed. Acquaintanceship had a large moderating effect whereas observer type did not moderate the level of convergence.