Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice
Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/0162-895x.00058
复制
发表时间：
1997-06-01
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Tetlock, PE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fiske, AP;Tetlock, PE
禁忌取舍违反了根深蒂固的规范直觉，即某些关系的完整性，甚至神圣性，以及这些关系背后的道德-政治价值观。例如，如果被要求评估一个人的孩子对国家的忠诚或友谊行为的金钱价值，人们会发现这些问题不仅仅是令人困惑或难以认知：他们发现这样的问题本身就是道德上的冒犯。本文借鉴了Fiske的关系理论和Tetlock的价值多元化模型：(A)确定人们可能将权衡视为禁忌的条件；(B)描述人们如何集体处理变得有问题的权衡；(C)明确道德愤怒的概念成分以及影响对各种显性权衡反应强度的因素；(D)探索决策者--由于资源稀缺和应对禁忌权衡的制度角色--所使用的各种策略，以转移审查观察者的愤怒；(E)提供一种以多元化为基础的争端解决方法。
Taboo trade-offs violate deeply held normative intuitions about the integrity, even sanctity, of certain relationships and the moral-political values underlying those relationships. For instance, if asked to estimate the monetary worth of one's children of one's loyalty to one's country, or of acts of friendship, people find the questions more than merely confusing or cognitively intractable: they find such questions themselves morally offensive. This article draws on Fiske's relational theory and Tetlock's value pluralism model: (a) to identify the conditions under which people are likely to treat trade-offs as taboo; (b) to describe how people collectively deal with trade-offs that become problematic; (c) to specify the conceptual components of moral outrage and the factors that affect the intensity of reactions to various explicit trade-offs; (d) to explore the various strategies that decision-makers-required by resource scarcity and institutional roles to confront taboo trade-offs-use to deflect the wrath of censorious observers; (e) to offer a method of dispute resolution based on pluralism.