Exploring the practices of steal-to-order burglars: a different brand of offender?
Exploring the practices of steal-to-order burglars: a different brand of offender?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1057/s41284-019-00174-w
复制
发表时间：
2019-12-01
期刊：
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
Malleson, Nicolas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Addis, Nicholas;Evans, Andrew;Malleson, Nicolas
这项研究有助于揭示盗窃到命令的罪犯之间很大程度上被忽视的做法，以期确定如何盗窃到命令的罪行可能会通过有针对性的干预中断。访谈进行了一个样本的监禁窃贼谁曾从事盗窃的罪行。除了强调盗窃订单和非盗窃订单的罪行之间的一些相似之处，本文说明了犯罪分子在盗窃订单犯罪期间表现出的专业精神的性质。此外，本文揭示了一个行为的连续体之间的罪犯从事盗窃，以提供：那些谁偷，以订购更一般的项目，和那些谁偷，以订购更专业的商品。本文还强调了潜在的缺乏灵活性的经验，盗窃到命令的罪犯，这在挑战犯罪学理论的罪犯决策的影响。本文最后讨论了如何在住宅和组织层面采取措施，以有效地破坏罪犯的做法，在盗窃到命令的罪行。
This research helps shed light on the largely overlooked practices amongst steal-to-order offenders, with a view to identifying ways in which steal-to-order offences may be disrupted through targeted intervention. Interviews were conducted with a sample of incarcerated burglars who have previously engaged in steal-to-order offences. In addition to highlighting a number of parallels between steal-to-order and non-steal-to-order offences, this paper illustrates the nature of professionalism exhibited by offenders during steal-to-order offences. Moreover, this paper reveals a behavioural continuum amongst offenders engaging in steal-to-order offences: those who steal-to-offer, those who steal-to-order more general items, and those who steal-to-order more specialist goods. The paper also highlights the potential lack of flexibility experienced by steal-to-order offenders, and the implications of this in challenging criminological theory of offender decision making. The paper concludes by discussing how steps at both a residential and organisational level may be taken to effectively disrupt the practices of offenders during steal-to-order offences.