Investigating Saccharomyces cerevisiae alkene reductase OYE 3 by substrate profiling, X-ray crystallography and computational methods

Investigating Saccharomyces cerevisiae alkene reductase OYE 3 by substrate profiling, X-ray crystallography and computational methods
复制标题

DOI:
10.1039/c8cy00440d
复制
发表时间:
2018-10
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Robert W. Powell, III;M. Pilar Buteler;Sunidhi Lenka;M. Crotti;Sara Santangelo;Matthew J. Burg;S. Bruner;E. Brenna;A. Roitberg;Jon D. Stewart
Robert W. Powell, III;M. Pilar Buteler;Sunidhi Lenka;M. Crotti;Sara Santangelo;Matthew J. Burg;S. Bruner;E. Brenna;A. Roitberg;Jon D. Stewart
中科院分区:
化学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Robert W. Powell, III;M. Pilar Buteler;Sunidhi Lenka;M. Crotti;Sara Santangelo;Matthew J. Burg;S. Bruner;E. Brenna;A. Roitberg;Jon D. Stewart

文献摘要

相似文献

酿酒酵母(Saccharomyces cerevisiae) OYE 3与研究充分的酵母(Saccharomyces pastorianus) OYE 1具有80%的序列一致性;然而,野生型oye3对某些烯烃底物表现出不同的立体选择性。在OYE 3中对Trp 116进行位点饱和诱变,然后进行底物分析,结果表明突变的影响相对较小,与之前在OYE 1中观察到的相反。无配体和酚结合oye3的x射线晶体结构分别被解析到1.8和1.9 A分辨率。这两种结构与oye1几乎相同,仅在活性位点区域有一个氨基酸差异(Ser 296与Phe 296,环6的一部分)。尽管它们的静态x射线结构基本相同,但分子动力学(MD)模拟显示,oye3和oye1在溶液中的环6构象存在显著差异。在OYE 3中,环路6几乎与晶体结构中观察到的一样开放;相比之下,环路6在oye1的活性位点上闭合了约4 A。与OYE 3相比,与OYE 1结合的底物可能产生更多的活性位点蛋白接触。这些差异为oye3和oye1的不同立体选择性提供了解释,尽管它们的x射线晶体结构几乎相同。
Saccharomyces cerevisiae OYE 3 shares 80% sequence identity with the well-studied Saccharomyces pastorianus OYE 1; however, wild-type OYE 3 shows different stereoselectivities toward some alkene substrates. Site-saturation mutagenesis of Trp 116 in OYE 3 followed by substrate profiling showed that the mutations had relatively little effect, opposite to that observed previously for OYE 1. The X-ray crystal structures of unliganded and phenol-bound OYE 3 were solved to 1.8 and 1.9 A resolution, respectively. Both structures were nearly identical to that of OYE 1, with only a single amino acid difference in the active site region (Ser 296 versus Phe 296, part of loop 6). Despite their essentially identical static X-ray structures, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed that loop 6 conformations differed significantly in solution between OYE 3 and OYE 1. In OYE 3, loop 6 remained nearly as open as observed in the crystal structure; by contrast, loop 6 closed over the active site of OYE 1 by ca. 4 A. Loop closure likely generates a greater number of active site protein contacts for substrate bound to OYE 1 as compared to OYE 3. These differences provide an explanation for the differing stereoselectivities of OYE 3 and OYE 1, despite their nearly identical X-ray crystal structures.