CONTRASTING APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF MOTOR EXPERTISE
CONTRASTING APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF MOTOR EXPERTISE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00336297.1994.10484120
复制
发表时间：
1994-05-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
PARKS, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
ABERNETHY, B;BURGESSLIMERICK, R;PARKS, S
目前的方法来检查的性质，专家的表现，在运动技能几乎完全来自于方法的专业知识，在认知心理学，一般来说，只有最低限度的影响，在运动控制和学习领域的理论进步。在本文中的观点是，未来的调查电机的专业知识应更紧密地联系在一起的概念发展，在电机控制与学习领域，选择的方法，研究电机的专业知识应指导一个彻底的考虑哲学基础的流行和新兴的方法。注意力是针对当前的范式之间的辩论认知和生态/动力学的方法来运动控制和学习，这场辩论的哲学基础。在每种方法的假设和局限性进行了简要的考虑，并检查每种方法的影响，研究电机的专业知识的方法。
Current approaches to examining the nature of expert performance in motor skills have been derived almost entirely from approaches to expertise used in cognitive psychology and, in general, have been influenced only minimally by theoretical advances in the motor control and learning field. In this paper the view is presented that future investigations of motor expertise should be tied more closely to conceptual developments in the motor control with learning field and that the selection of methods for studying motor expertise should be guided by a thorough consideration of the philosophical underpinnings of prevailing and emerging approaches. Attention is directed to current paradigmatic debates between cognitive and ecological/dynamical approaches to motor control and learning and to the philosophical bases of this debate. Assumptions and limitations in each approach are briefly considered, and the implications of each approach for methods of studying motor expertise are examined.