Measuring Sexual Aggression Perpetration in College Men: A Comparison of Two Measures.
Measuring Sexual Aggression Perpetration in College Men: A Comparison of Two Measures.
复制标题
衡量大学生的性侵犯行为：两种措施的比较。
DOI：
10.1037/a0037584
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Pagnan,ColleenE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Testa,Maria;Hoffman,JosephH;Lucke,JosephF;Pagnan,ColleenE
本研究的目的是提供一个比较率的自我报告的性侵犯犯罪获得使用2种不同的措施-一个版本的性经验调查（SES;修道院，帕克希尔，克林顿-谢罗德，和Zawacki，2007年;科斯，Gidycz，和Wisniewski，1987年）和性策略量表（SSS，斯特朗，彼得森，希尔，&海曼，2013;斯特鲁克曼-约翰逊，斯特鲁克曼-约翰逊，&安德森，2003）。我们还使用Rasch模型项目分析检查了每个测量的心理测量结构（Rasch，1966年）。方法两个相当的队列进入大一男生（n= 994和n= 1043）从一个大的东北大学完成了在线措施，在他们的第一学期末。ResultsThe identical proportions of men reported using intoxication strategies（3%）and physical force（1%）在过去的一个学期里，这两项措施。与社会经济地位（3.7%）相比，更多的男性在SSS（7.8%）上报告了口头策略，即使限制在同等项目上。Rasch分析表明，SSS更好地符合一个一维连续的犯罪严重程度比SES，但是，Rasch分析没有提供明确的支持，无论是战术为基础的（SSS）或战术加结果为基础的（SES）hierarchy.ConclusionsBoth措施运作充分。然而，SSS可能是更好的Rasch属性，更好地评估不太严重的战术，更简单的措辞。
ObjectiveThe present study was designed to provide a comparison of rates of self-reported sexual aggression perpetration obtained using 2 different measures—a version of the Sexual Experiences Survey (SES; Abbey, Parkhill, Clinton-Sherrod, & Zawacki, 2007; Koss, Gidycz, & Wisniewski, 1987) and the Sexual Strategies Scale (SSS, Strang, Peterson, Hill, & Heiman, 2013; Struckman-Johnson, Struckman-Johnson, & Anderson, 2003). We also examined the psychometric structure of each measure using Rasch model item analysis (Rasch, 1966).MethodTwo equivalent cohorts of entering freshman males (n= 994 and n= 1043) from a large northeastern university completed online measures at the end of their first semester.ResultsIdentical proportions of men reported using intoxication strategies (3%) and physical force (1%) during the past semester on both measures. More men reported verbal strategies on the SSS (7.8%) compared with the SES (3.7%), even when restricting to equivalent items. Rasch analysis suggested that the SSS conformed better to a unidimensional continuum of perpetration severity than the SES; however, Rasch analysis did not provide definitive support for either a tactic-based (SSS) or a tactic-plus-outcome–based (SES) hierarchy.ConclusionsBoth measures functioned adequately. However, the SSS may be preferred for its better Rasch properties, better assessment of the less severe tactics, and simpler wording.