A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory
A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x
复制
发表时间：
2000-02-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Rogers, RW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Floyd, DL;Prentice-Dunn, S;Rogers, RW
本文报道了有关保护动机理论的文献的首次荟萃分析（Rogers，1975，1983； Rogers＆Prentice-Dunn，1997），这是一种预防疾病和健康促进的模型，已经产生了二十年多的研究。文献综述包括65项相关研究（n =约30,000），这些研究代表了20个健康问题。平均总效应大小（D+ = .52）为中等程度。通常，威胁严重性，威胁脆弱性，响应效率和自我效能的增加促进了适应性意图或行为。相反，适应不良反应的减少奖励和自适应反应成本增加了自适应意图或行为。无论这些措施是基于意图还是行为，这都是正确的，并暗示PMT组件可能对个人和社区干预有用。
This article reports the first meta-analysis of the literature on protection motivation theory (Rogers, 1975, 1983; Rogers & Prentice-Dunn, 1997), a model of disease prevention and health promotion that has generated research for over two decades. The literature review included 65 relevant studies (N = approximately 30,000) that represented over 20 health issues. The mean overall effect size (d+ = .52) was of moderate magnitude. In general, increases in threat severity, threat vulnerability, response efficacy, and self-efficacy facilitated adaptive intentions or behaviors. Conversely, decreases in maladaptive response rewards and adaptive response costs increased adaptive intentions or behaviors. This held true whether the measures were based on intentions or behaviors, and suggests that PMT components may be useful for individual and community interventions.