Comprehension of relations among controversial texts: effects of external strategy use
Comprehension of relations among controversial texts: effects of external strategy use
复制标题
对有争议文本之间关系的理解：外部策略使用的影响
DOI：
10.1007/s11251-007-9041-6
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Keiichi Kobayashi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Keiichi Kobayashi
本研究考察了外部策略的使用对理解有争议文本之间关系的影响。大约 80 名本科生阅读了六篇有争议的文本，目的是寻找互文关系或对有争议的问题形成自己的看法。其中一半被允许使用外部策略，另一半则不允许。结果表明，只有当给定关系发现的目的时，外部策略用户在理解互文关系方面才会比非用户表现得更好。当允许使用外部策略时，以寻找关系为目的的读者也优于以形成意见为目的的读者。无论阅读目的如何，外部策略的使用对文本内论点的回忆没有影响。这些结果是根据读者使用外部策略来服务其阅读目的的情况进行讨论的。
This study examined the effects of external strategy use on the comprehension of relations among controversial texts. About 80 undergraduates read six controversial texts for the purpose of either finding intertextual relations or forming their opinion about the controversial issue. Half of them were permitted to use external strategies, the other half were not. Results indicated that only when given a purpose of relation-finding did external strategy users perform better than non-users in the comprehension of intertextual relations. Readers with a purpose of relation-finding also outperformed readers with a purpose of opinion-forming when permitted to use external strategies. The use of external strategies had no influence on the recall of intratextual arguments, regardless of reading purpose. These results were discussed in terms of readers’ use of external strategies to serve their reading purposes.