The Influence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on the Relationship Between the Perception of Speech in Noise and Dysarthric Speech.
The Influence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on the Relationship Between the Perception of Speech in Noise and Dysarthric Speech.
复制标题
感音神经性听力损失对噪声中言语感知与构音障碍言语之间关系的影响。
DOI：
10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00115
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Borrie,StephanieA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yoho,SarahE;Barrett,TysonS;Borrie,StephanieA
在不利的听力条件下理解言语的能力在不同的听众中是高度可变的。尽管如此，研究发现，听力正常的听众在不同类型的退化语音中感知语音的能力表现出一致性，这表明至少对于这些听众来说，全球技能可能涉及导航语音信号中的模糊性。然而，听力正常和听力受损的听众所面临的感知挑战存在实质性差异。这项研究检查了感音神经性听力损失的听众在处理神经型（即，方法听力正常者（n= 31）和感音神经性听力损失者（n= 36）完成了一个清晰度任务与神经典型的语言在噪音和构音障碍的语言在安静。结果发现是一致的，与以前的工作表明，能力之间的关系，感知神经典型的语言，噪声和构音障碍的语言，听力正常的听众，虽然在更高的清晰度水平比以前观察到的。这种关系也观察到听力损失的听众，虽然更严重的听力损失的听众表现更好的构音障碍的讲话比neurotypical语音在nois.ConclusionsThis研究表明，在清晰度性能的听众在两种不同类型的退化语音的高水平的一致性，即使当这些听众进一步挑战的存在感音神经性听力损失。听力损失的听众和他们的沟通伙伴构音障碍的临床意义进行了讨论。
PurposeThe ability to understand speech under adverse listening conditions is highly variable across listeners. Despite this, studies have found that listeners with normal hearing display consistency in their ability to perceive speech across different types of degraded speech, suggesting that, for at least these listeners, global skills may be involved in navigating the ambiguity in speech signals. However, there are substantial differences in the perceptual challenges faced by listeners with normal and impaired hearing. This study examines whether listeners with sensorineural hearing loss demonstrate the same type of consistency as normal-hearing listeners when processing neurotypical (i.e., control) speech that has been degraded by external noise and speech that is neurologically degraded such as dysarthria.MethodListeners with normal hearing (n= 31) and listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (n= 36) completed an intelligibility task with neurotypical speech in noise and with dysarthric speech in quiet.ResultsFindings were consistent with previous work demonstrating a relationship between the ability to perceive neurotypical speech in noise and dysarthric speech for listeners with normal hearing, albeit at a higher intelligibility level than previously observed. This relationship was also observed for listeners with hearing loss, although listeners with more severe hearing losses performed better with dysarthric speech than with neurotypical speech in noise.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated a high level of consistency in intelligibility performance for listeners across two different types of degraded speech, even when those listeners were further challenged by the presence of sensorineural hearing loss. Clinical implications for both listeners with hearing loss and their communication partners with dysarthria are discussed.