Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: Does conflict really matter?
Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: Does conflict really matter?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.831
复制
发表时间：
2005-08-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Hasbroucq, T
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Burle, B;Allain, S;Hasbroucq, T
虽然人们普遍认为控制机制是人类行为适应所必需的，但人们对这种机制是如何招募的知之甚少。M. M. Botvinick，T. S.布拉弗角S. Carter，D. M. Barch和J.D. Cohen（2001）提出了冲突循环理论。这个理论已经成功地解释了不相容试验后相容性效应的减少：平均而言，在不相容试验期间，冲突水平较高，在这样的试验后发生更多的控制。作者们根据冲突的数量（通过肌电图活动量化）对试验进行了分类，从而验证了这一预测。不兼容的试验后，观察到的兼容性效果减少，但它是独立的冲突水平对以前的审判，这表明冲突不会引发执行控制的变化。冲突监测模型的后果进行了讨论。
Although it is widely accepted that control mechanisms are necessary for human behavior to be adapted, very little is known about how such mechanisms are recruited. A suggestion to fill the gap was put forward by M. M. Botvinick, T. S. Braver, C. S. Carter, D. M. Barch, and J. D. Cohen (2001), who proposed the conflict-loop theory. This theory has been successful in accounting for the reduction of compatibility effects after an incompatible trial: The level of conflict being, on average, higher during an incompatible trial, more control occurs after such a trial. The authors have tested this prediction by sorting the trials on the basis of amount of conflict (quantified by the electromyographic activity) they presented. A reduction of the compatibility effect was observed after incompatible trials, but it was independent of the level of conflict on previous trials, suggesting that the conflict does not trigger changes in executive control. Consequences for the conflict monitoring model are discussed.