Exploring individual differences in reactions to mortality salience: Does attachment style regulate terror management mechanisms?
Exploring individual differences in reactions to mortality salience: Does attachment style regulate terror management mechanisms?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.79.2.260
复制
发表时间：
2000-08-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Florian, V
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mikulincer, M;Florian, V
五项研究考察了依恋方式对死亡率显著效应的影响。在研究1中，死亡突显只在焦虑-矛盾和回避的人中导致更严格的越轨判断，而在安全的人中不会。此外，焦虑矛盾的人在严重性判断上表现出立即和延迟的增加，而回避型的人只有在延迟一段时间后才表现出这种反应。在研究2中，焦虑-矛盾情绪的人在死亡提醒后，死亡思想的可及性立即和延迟增加。避难者和安全者只有在延迟一段时间后才会表现出这种效果。研究3显示，对死亡突显的世界观防御仅在回避者中降低了死亡思维的可及性。研究4-5表明，死亡的突显导致象征性不朽意识的增加，以及仅在安全的人中的亲密愿望的增加，而在回避和焦虑-矛盾的人中则不是。
Five studies examined the contribution of attachment style to mortality salience effects. In Study 1, mortality salience led to more severe judgments of transgressions only among anxious-ambivalent and avoidant persons but not among secure persons. In addition, whereas anxious-ambivalent persons showed immediate and delayed increases in severity judgments, avoidant persons showed this response only after a delay period. In Study 2, anxious-ambivalent persons showed immediate and delayed increases in death-thought accessibility after death reminders. Avoidant and secure persons showed this effect only after a delay period. Study 3 revealed that worldview defense in response to mortality salience reduced death-thought accessibility only among avoidant persons. Studies 4-5 revealed that mortality salience led to an increase in the sense of symbolic immortality as well as in the desire of intimacy only among secure persons, but not among avoidant and anxious-ambivalent persons.