Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine pharmacokinetics in malaria: Pediatric dosing implications

Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine pharmacokinetics in malaria: Pediatric dosing implications
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.clpt.2006.08.016
复制
发表时间:
2006-12-01
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
White, Nicholas J.
White, Nicholas J.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Barnes, Karen I.;Little, Francesca;White, Nicholas J.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:我们的目的是描述磺胺嘧啶-乙胺嘧啶在非洲成人和儿童急性恶性疟疾的药代动力学特性。尽管几十年的广泛使用,有很少的数据,以告知剂量recommendations.Methods:在一项前瞻性的多中心药代动力学研究,在307例急性恶性疟疾,毛细血管血中磺胺嘧啶和乙胺嘧啶浓度测定在9个访问超过一段时间的42 days。经剂量调整后,2 ~ 5岁儿童的磺胺嘧啶和乙胺嘧啶的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)均为成人的一半(中位AUC,410 μ g/mL d [四分位距(IQR),126-705 μ g/mL d]对比816 μ g/mL d [IQF,磺胺嘧啶为536-1150 μ g/mL d] [P= 0.0001],乙胺嘧啶为620 ng/mL d [IQF,229-1399 ng/mL d] vs 1518 ng/mL - d [IQR,1117-2013 ng/mL - d])。与成人相比,年龄对磺胺嘧啶和乙胺嘧啶AUC的影响反映了2至5岁儿童的清除率较高,表观分布容积较大(中位清除率,64.5 mL kg(-1)d(-1)[IQF,46.2-132.6 mL kg(-1)d(-1)]对比32.7 mL kg(-1)d(-1)[IQR,22.3-52.2 mL kg(-1)d(-1)],磺胺嘧啶[P=.0001]和1.77 L kg(-1)d(-1)[IQR,1.0-3.0 L kg(-1)d(-1)]对比0.85 L kg(-1)d(-1)[IQR,乙胺嘧啶为0.62-1.21 L kg(-1)d(-1)][P=.0001];中位分布容积为413 mL/kg [IQR,299-711 mL/kg],硫代嘌呤为372 mL/kg [IQR,267-488 mL/kg][P=.0021],3.83-11.24 L/kg]对比乙胺嘧啶的3.83 L/kg [IQF,2.73-5.11 L/kg][P=.0001])。第7天磺胺嘧啶和乙胺嘧啶的浓度提供了其各自AUC的良好替代测量(R-2 >= 0.72)。药代动力学因素可能会导致婴幼儿磺胺嘧啶-乙胺嘧啶抗疟治疗失败的风险增加。目前的剂量建议需要修订。我们预测,2至5岁的儿童应与1克磺胺嘧啶/50毫克乙胺嘧啶治疗,以达到药物浓度相当于成人。
Objective: Our objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetic properties of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in African adults and children with acute falciparum malaria. Despite decades of widespread use, there are few data to inform dose recommendations.Methods: In a prospective multicenter pharmacokinetic study in 307 patients with acute falciparum malaria, capillary blood concentrations of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine were determined at 9 visits over a period of 42 days by mass spectrometry.Results. After adjustment for dose, the area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine in children aged 2 to 5 years were half of those in adults (median AUC, 410 mu g/mL d [interquartile range (IQR), 126-705 mu/mL d] versus 816 mu g/mL d [IQF, 536-1150 mu g/mL d] [P=.0001] for sulfadoxine and 620 ng/mL d [IQF, 229-1399 ng/mL d] versus 1518 ng/mL - d [IQR, 1117-2013 ng/mL - d] for pyrimethamine). The effect of age on the AUC of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine reflected higher clearance rates and larger apparent volumes of distribution in children aged 2 to 5 years when compared with adults (median clearance, 64.5 mL kg(-1) d(-1) [IQF, 46.2-132.6 mL kg(-1) d(-1)] versus 32.7 mL kg(-1) d(-1) [IQR, 22.3-52.2 mL kg(-1) d(-1)] for sulfadoxine [P=.0001] and 1.77 L kg(-1) d(-1) [IQR, 1.0-3.0 L kg(-1) d(-1)] versus 0.85 L kg(-1) d(-1) [IQR, 0.62-1.21 L kg(-1) d(-1)] for pyrimethamine [P=.0001]; median volume of distribution, 413 mL/kg [IQR, 299-711 mL/kg] versus 372 mL/kg [IQR, 267-488 mL/kg] for sulfadoxine [P=.0021] and 6.28 L/kg [IQR, 3.83-11.24 L/kg] versus 3.83 L/kg [IQF, 2.73-5.11 L/kg] for pyrimethamine [P=.0001]). Day 7 concentrations of both sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine provided good surrogate measures (R-2 >= 0.72) of their respective AUCs.Conclusions. Pharmacokinetic factors may contribute to the increased risk of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine antimalarial treatment failure in young children. The current dose recommendations need revision. We predict that children aged 2 to 5 years should be treated with I g sulfadoxine/50 mg pyrimethamine to achieve drug concentrations equivalent to those in adults.