Mendel’s reaction to Darwin’s provisional hypothesis of pangenesis and the experiment that could not wait
Mendel’s reaction to Darwin’s provisional hypothesis of pangenesis and the experiment that could not wait
复制标题
孟德尔对达尔文泛生论临时假说的反应以及迫不及待的实验
DOI:
10.1038/s41437-022-00546-w
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
T. H. Ellis
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. V. van Dijk;T. H. Ellis
Domestication” which comprised two volumes and 28 chapters, one of which presented his provisional theory of inheritance, which he called “Pangenesis”. Gregor Mendel bought a copy of the German translation in early 1869. Mendel’s copy is annotated with lines in the margins and underscored sentences, indicating which passages he considered important. The great majority of Mendel’s annotations are found in the chapter on pangenesis. From the few comments Mendel wrote, it can be concluded that he found Darwin’s ideas highly speculative. Several annotations relate to Darwin’s claim that multiple pollen grains must fertilize an egg cell to form a seed. In contrast, Mendel’s theory of inheritance was based on the random union of one egg cell and one pollen grain. Mendel wrote to Carl Nägeli, in Munich, that this matter was so important that he had to conduct single-grain pollination experiments in Mirabilis despite suffering from eye ailments. Mendel’s result was consistent with his theory; in all 18 attempts, a single pollen grain was sufficient to form a seed and vigorous offspring. The following year he repeated the experiment with the same result. In addition, for Mendel’s theory, no more than one pollen grain should fertilize an egg cell. Mendel tested this by conducting pollinations with two different grains simultaneously; each from a plant with different flower color. Information about the outcome of this experiment has not survived, but the design of the experiment provides an insight into Mendel’s clear thinking. Here we contrast Mendel and Darwin’s views of inheritance.