Framing interethnic ideology: effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals.
Framing interethnic ideology: effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals.
复制标题
构建种族间意识形态：多元文化和色盲观点对群体和个人判断的影响。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.635
复制
发表时间：
2000
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Wittenbrink,B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wolsko,C;Park,B;Judd,CM;Wittenbrink,B
在3个实验中，美国白色大学生收到一条信息，主张采取色盲或多元文化的意识形态方法来改善种族间的关系，然后对不同的种族群体和个人做出判断。相对于色盲的角度来看，多元文化的角度导致更强的刻板印象，这些刻板印象的准确性更高，并在个人的判断中更多地使用类别信息。这种类别间差异的增加既发生在有利于内组的属性上，也发生在有利于外组的属性上，并且在某些情况下还与对外组更大的总体积极性配对。研究结果使我们质疑的隐含假设驱动大多数社会心理学的偏见减少的努力：分类过程导致偏见，因此，社会类别的相关性必须被淡化。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
In 3 experiments, White American college students received a message advocating either a color-blind or a multicultural ideological approach to improving interethnic relations and then made judgments about various ethnic groups and individuals. Relative to a color-blind perspective, the multicultural perspective led to stronger stereotypes, greater accuracy in these stereotypes, and greater use of category information in judgments of individuals. This increase in between-category differentiation occurred both for attributes that favored the in-group and for attributes that favored the out-group and was also paired in some cases with greater overall positivity toward the out-group. The findings lead us to question the implicit assumption driving the majority of social psychological efforts at prejudice reduction: that the categorization process leads to prejudice, and that the relevance of social categories must therefore be de-emphasized.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)