The Matilda Effect-Role Congruity Effects on Scholarly Communication: A Citation Analysis of Communication Research and Journal of Communication Articles
The Matilda Effect-Role Congruity Effects on Scholarly Communication: A Citation Analysis of Communication Research and Journal of Communication Articles
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0093650211418339
复制
发表时间：
2013-02-01
影响因子：
6.2
通讯作者：
Glynn, Carroll J.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia;Glynn, Carroll J.
本研究以角色契合理论为基础，对《传播研究》和《传播杂志》1991-2005年发表的1020篇论文进行了统计分析，并对这些文章的ISI引文和被引情况进行了分析。与假设的“玛蒂尔达效应”(对女性科学家的认识不足)相一致，女性传播学家撰写的文章被引用的次数比男性少。研究主题、作者生产率和引用作者性别的影响以及影响程度随时间的变化的假设是从理论框架中推导出来的。网络概念化导致了一个额外的假设。六个假设中有五个得到了支持。
Using role congruity theory as the basis for the study, an analysis of 1,020 articles published 1991-2005 in Communication Research and Journal of Communication, as well as the ISI citations these articles received and the citations these articles included, was conducted. In line with a hypothesized "Matilda effect" (underrecognition of female scientists), articles authored by female communication scientists received fewer citations than articles authored by males. Hypotheses on moderating impacts of research topic, author productivity, and citing author's sex, as well as on change in the effect's extent across time were derived from the theoretical framework. Networking conceptualizations led to an additional hypothesis. Five of six hypotheses were supported.