Extending the performance capabilities of isoSTED
Extending the performance capabilities of isoSTED
复制标题
扩展 isoSTED 的性能
DOI:
10.1016/j.bpj.2021.07.005
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Galbraith, Catherine G.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Boehm, Ulrike;Galbraith, Catherine G.
If you try to focus light with a lens, you will soon realize that you cannot create a point. Instead, the intensity of light that you focus will always be wider and longer because of the diffraction of light. The created intensity pattern is called a point spread function (PSF). In the 19th century, the physicist Ernst Abbe was able to show that the size of the PSF depends on the wavelength of the used light and the light collection angle of the lens (1). According to Abbe, when a single lens is used, the PSF will be shaped like an ellipsoid, with a width of approximately half the wavelength of the input light in the focal plane and a length two to threefold that size along the optical axis. The PSF of a microscope is of fundamental importance because its shape ultimately defines the resolution limit of a conventional microscope. Structures smaller than the PSF will appear to be the same size as the PSF and have the same elongated distortion along the optical axis. However, the anisotropy of the PSF can be reduced if two opposing lenses are used. This arrangement, referred to as 4Pi, doubles the light collection angle and increases the resolution along the optical axis by three-to sevenfold (2–4). However, although 4Pi microscopes can reach a nearly isotropic resolution, they remain diffraction-limited. Superresolution microscopes or nanoscopes also experience the diffraction limit of light. Still, they are theoretically diffraction-unlimited because they take advantage of molecular state transitions, typically between a fluorescent (ON) and nonfluorescent (OFF) state (5). Stimulated emission depletion (STED), reversible fluorescent saturable optical transition (RESOLFT), and photoactivation localization/stochastical optical reconstruction microscopes all use the ON and OFF states of fluorophores either in a controlled or random way in time or space to overcome the diffraction limit. A STED microscope operates similarly to a confocal microscope. However, in STED, two concentric and synchronized laser beams are scanned across the specimen. They control the transition of the fluorophores between their excited (ON state) and their ground state (OFF state) to create a diffraction-unlimited image. The first beam (ON switching beam) excites fluorophores from their OFF to their ON state. Then, the second donut-shaped beam (OFF-switching beam) pushes excited fluorophores back to their OFF state before they can emit fluorescence. Only signal from fluorophores in the center of the donut that were not pushed back to their OFF state can be detected. So, although both beams are diffraction-limited, using them to control the ON and OFF state of the fluorophores breaks the diffraction limit. RESOLFT microscopy functions similarly but switches the fluorophores between different conformational states, which requires a less powerful OFF-switching beam. However, it takes longer to acquire an RESOLFT image than an STED image because the pixel dwell times required for switching between conformational states with the currently available fluorophores are, on average, at least one order of magnitude larger than for switching between ground and excited states of fluorophores. Despite the advances provided by superresolution microscopes, even these technologies can benefit from the earlier developed 4Pi arrangement when tasked with reaching diffraction-unlimited threedimensional (3D) resolution. Here, the incredibly sharp and light-efficient patterns/modulations created in 4Pi microscopes, and the doubled light detection have been shown to significantly improve the images collected using STED (6), RESOLFT (7), and photoactivation localization/stochastical optical reconstruction (8, 9 …