The format type has impact on the quality of pathology reports of oncological lung resection specimens
The format type has impact on the quality of pathology reports of oncological lung resection specimens
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.05.017
复制
发表时间：
2013-09-01
期刊：
影响因子：
5.3
通讯作者：
Werner, Martin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Aumann, Konrad;Kayser, Gian;Werner, Martin
大多数病理学报告都是叙述性的，没有特定的结构，偶尔也会缺乏重要的信息。在这里，我们表明，肿瘤肺切除标本的病理报告的格式与报告的质量相关。将2002年1月至2011年4月期间所有肿瘤肺切除标本的病理报告（N=878）分类为描述性报告（DR，N=249）、结构化报告（SR，N=415）以及基于模板的概要报告（TBSR，N=214），并就器官特异性基本数据（艾德）的内容进行比较。记录的艾德量总结为基本数据评分（EDS）。DR的中位EDS为8，SR为9，TBSR为10。所有报告中只有28.7%的EDS为10;按报告类型划分，2.6%的DR、16.4%的SR和88.4%的TBSR的EDS为10（配对比较：P
Most pathology reports are in a narrative form without a given structure and occasionally lack important information. Here we show that the format of pathology reports of oncological lung resection specimens correlates with the quality of the reports. All pathology reports of oncological lung resection specimens between 01/02 and 04/11 (N=878) were classified into descriptive reports (DR, N=249), structured reports (SR, N=415) as well as template based synoptic reports (TBSR, N=214) and compared regarding the content of organ specific essential data (ED). The amount of recorded ED was summarized in an essential data score (EDS). Median EDS of DR was 8, of SR 9, and of TBSR 10. Only 28.7% of all reports had an EDS of 10; divided into the report types 2.6% of DR, 16.4% of SR and 88.4% of TBSR obtained an EDS of 10 (paired comparison: P