Electromagnetic interference hazards in flight and the 5G mobile phone: Review of critical issues in aviation security
Electromagnetic interference hazards in flight and the 5G mobile phone: Review of critical issues in aviation security
复制标题
飞行中的电磁干扰危害与5G手机：航空安全关键问题回顾
DOI：
10.1016/j.trpro.2021.11.123
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Maxim Solkin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Maxim Solkin
本文对飞机系统潜在的有害电磁干扰（EMI）进行了部分综述。从广义上讲，这种电磁干扰可能来自以下三种可能的来源之一：便携式电子设备，特别是飞行乘客携带的移动电话；飞机外部的电磁干扰源；或者来自大气层中核爆炸产生的高空电磁脉冲（HEMP），否则是产生类似结果的模拟。所有这些类型的电磁干扰都具有潜在的致命性，需要在设计和航空安全政策上加以缓解。重点是故意电磁干扰（IEMI），为了简洁起见，这可能包括在飞行的任何阶段激活的移动电话，能够损害航空电子仪器，并最终危及飞机及其乘客的安全。考虑了影响飞机系统的人工电磁干扰，不包括由闪电现象引起的自然电磁干扰。该论文证实，现代手机（尤其是5G手机）是一个“高功率故意发射器”，能够造成严重的电磁干扰。除其他外，本文还概述了飞行过程中由ped引起的电磁干扰数据缺乏的问题，以及文献中的一些“矛盾心理”，影响航空安全的监管“方法”，以及对这些挑战的回应。
This paper presents a partial review of potential harmful Electromagnetic Interference, EMI to aircraft systems. In broad terms this EMI may result from either of three possible sources: Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs), particularly mobile phones carried by flying passengers; sources of electromagnetic (EM) interference external to the aircraft; OR from a High Altitude Electronic Magnetic Pulse (HEMP) resulting from a nuclear detonation in the atmosphere – otherwise a simulation producing a similar result. All these types of EMI are potentially deadly and need to be mitigated in design as well as aviation security policies. The focus is onIntentionalEMI (IEMI), and for the purpose of conciseness, this may include a mobile phone which is activated during any phase of flight, and capable of compromising the avionics instruments, and ultimately the safety of the aircraft and its passengers. Artificial EMI impacting aircraft systems is considered, excluding the natural EMI resulting from the phenomenon of lightning. The paper confirms the modern mobile phone (particularly a 5G phone) as a ‘high power intentional emitter’ capable of causing serious EMI. Inter alia, the issue of scarcity of data on EMI caused by PEDs during flight is outlined, along with some ‘ambivalence’ in the literature, the regulatory ‘approach’ impacting aviation safety, and a response to these challenges.