Automatic Computerized Perimetry in Neuro-Ophthalmology
Automatic Computerized Perimetry in Neuro-Ophthalmology
复制标题
神经眼科自动计算机视野检查
DOI：
10.1007/978-94-009-9611-3_35
复制
发表时间：
1979
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
C. Holmin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Bynke;A. Heijl;C. Holmin
本文应用计算机自动视野计对63例115眼神经系统疾病患者进行了检查。使用Goldmann仪器手动动态视野检查进行比较。在92个视野中，自动方法显示了手动视野检查发现的所有缺陷。此外，在8个领域，它发现了在最初的人工检查中遗漏的小缺陷。其余15个字段使用两种方法均正常。在12例患者的22个病理领域，这两项检查在疾病的过程中重复，并显示平行的改善，恶化或不变的缺陷。结论：自动视野检查法在检测神经源性视野缺损方面上级优于手动视野检查法，在追踪中小型视野缺损方面可取代手动视野检查法。对于大的缺陷，这是不合适的。
115 eyes of 63 patients with neurological diseases were examined with an automatic computerized perimeter. Manual kinetic perimetry with Goldmann’s instrument was used for comparison. In 92 fields the automatic method disclosed all defects that had been found by manual perimetry. Furthermore, in 8 fields it revealed small defects that had been missed at the initial manual examination. The remaining 15 fields were normal using both methods. In 22 pathological fields of 12 patients both examinations were repeated during the course of the disease and showed parallel improvement, deterioration or unchanged defects. It was concluded that the automatic method is superior to manual kinetic perimetry in detecting visual field defects of neurological origin, and that it may replace the manual method in following up small and medium-sized defects. For large defects it is not suitable.