A POSSIBLE LINK BETWEEN VITAMIN-D DEFICIENCY AND IMPAIRED HOST DEFENSE TO MYCOBACTERIUM-TUBERCULOSIS
A POSSIBLE LINK BETWEEN VITAMIN-D DEFICIENCY AND IMPAIRED HOST DEFENSE TO MYCOBACTERIUM-TUBERCULOSIS
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/0041-3879(85)90068-6
复制
发表时间:
1985-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
DAVIES, PDO
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
DAVIES, PDO
The author has drawn together evidence from his own work and that of others to suggest that poor vitamin D status may be an aetiological factor to explain certain aspects of the epidemiology of tuberculosis (TB) in the UK.A national survey carried out in 1978-79 showed that the annual incidence for respiratory TB among persons whose ethnic origins were in the Indian subcontinent was 30 times greater than that in the white population and for non-respiratory disease, 80 times. In the white population it is the oldest age groups which have the highest incidence of TB; those infected comprise particularly vagrants and lodging-house dwellers and are almost entirely men in the latter half of life. Many workers have reported that vitamin D status of Asians in the UK is poorer than that of the indigenous white population and also that there is an increased risk of vitamin D deficiency in the elderly of both racial groups. The author also points out that his own studies demonstrated in the UK significantly lower serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-OHD) concentrations in tuberculosis patients than in matched control individuals, and in Indonesia less severe disease in those with higher 25-OHD concentrations.Recent work does suggest that vitamin D deficiency may result in an impaired cellular immune response and that the 2 most effective drugs against TB, isoniazid and rifampicin, would both appear to compromise vitamin D metabolism. Therefore, there is evidence to support the possibility that vitamin D deficiency may adversely affect chemotherapy. [However, the evidence currently available to suggest that poor vitamin D status in particular groups may make them more vulnerable to infection from TB may have been wrongly interpreted. In both of the author's studies where he claims support for this hypothesis he overlooks the fact the serum 25-OHD was determined by daylight exposure. In selecting matched control individuals for a study on 50, mainly white, patients with respiratory TB, he took into account age and sex and used other family members where possible, but characteristics such as outdoor pastimes, occupation, recent holidays etc., all of which have been shown to influence vitamin D status, were not mentioned. In his Indonesian study there was no difference in vitamin D status between patients and control subjects and his conclusion that poor vitamin D status may have predisposed to more severe infection overlooked the influence of socioeconomic factors which are probably much more important in determining both chance of infection and exposed to sunlight [seeTrop. Dis. Bull.,1986,83,abst. 2281]. In the UK there is no doubt that many Asians have poor vitamin D status but no one to my knowledge has examined the serum 25-OHD of vagrants etc., many of whom may well have relatively high concentrations of 25-OHD because of their outdoor lifestyle. In any case, the fall in 25-OHD with age is much more evident in women than in men; studies have shown that over the age of 65 years the concentration of 25-OHD is higher in men at all ages.It would seem unlikely, therefore, that vitamin D statusper seis responsible for predisposing white UK males to TB and, although vitamin D status is often poor in the Asian community, the author has not excluded the possibility that socioeconomic factors may be responsible both for the increased risk of infection and the poor vitamin D status, and better controls are needed.]newline˜D.I. Thurnham