Aspects of the roots of language: commentary on Cziko
Aspects of the roots of language: commentary on Cziko
复制标题
语言根源的各个方面:齐科的评论
DOI:
10.1177/014272378900902504
复制
发表时间:
1989
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
R. Weist
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Weist
irrealis versus realis; and (3) durative aspect2 punctual versus nonpunctual (e.g. Bickerton 1984: 183, Table 1). The stative versus nonstative (or dynamic) distinction is also essential to the Creole system. According to Bickerton (e.g. 1975: 47), stative verbs cannot be marked as nonpunctual, and the temporal reference of the least marked stative verb is nonpast in contrast to past for dynamic verbs. Bickerton (1981) argues that the TMA system is the same in child (as in Creole) language, both being a product of the bioprogram. The present paper is a reply to Cziko’s (1989) review of the aspectual component of Bickerton’s argument. Specifically, the present paper examines what Cziko calls the state-process (i.e. state-dynamic) and the punctual-nonpunctual hypothesis. According to the state-dynamic hypothesis, children will initially use progressive aspect with dynamic verbs but not stative verbs, and according to the punctual-nonpunctual hypothesis, ’children will initially use past tense for events which are punctual (nondurative) and the present tense for nonpunctual (durative) events’ (p. 17) The punctual-nonpunctual distinction is in the domain of viewpoint aspect (or aspect), and the stative-nonstative distinction is in the domain of situational aspect (or lexical aspect) (see Smith 1986). Viewpoint aspect concerns the distinction between internal and external perspective on situations. Given the external perspective, languages are likely to focus on the feature completed, and given the internal perspective, incomplete or continuous