Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much ... or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators
Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much ... or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.006
复制
发表时间:
2013-01-01
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Tinsley, Catherine H.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Amanatullah, Emily T.;Tinsley, Catherine H.
We complement prior findings that self-advocating female negotiators are reluctant to assert their interests and subsequently suffer financial repercussions, relative to other-advocating females, self-advocating males, and other-advocating males, by showing that self-advocating female negotiators who do assert their interests suffer negative social judgments (i.e., backlash). We use nascent theory on societal norms for the behavior of each gender to explain why advocacy context moderates backlash. We show that assertive, self-advocating women suffer a social backlash (for example, decreased likability) because their behavior is associated with high negative masculine and low positive feminine characterizations. Non-assertive, other-advocating women suffer a leadership backlash (for example, lower presumed competency) because their behavior is associated with high negative feminine and low positive masculine characterizations. Interestingly, male negotiators do not suffer any backlash consequences despite being characterized in a fashion similar to that of the females in each condition. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.