On the judgment of loudness, noisiness and annoyance with actual and artificial noises
On the judgment of loudness, noisiness and annoyance with actual and artificial noises
复制标题
论对实际噪声和人工噪声的响度、噪声和烦扰度的判断
DOI：
10.1016/0022-460x(88)90370-7
复制
发表时间：
1988
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
H. Fastl
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Kuwano;S. Namba;H. Fastl
响度，嘈杂和烦恼被判断为36个刺激的日本和德国的主题。在实验1中，使用实际的噪音，如飞机和道路交通噪音。在实验2中，使用人工噪声。它们的电平模式被模拟为对应于实验1中使用的实际声源，并且载体是粉红噪声。绝对震级估计用于判断。8名德国受试者和8名日本受试者参加了研究。对实际声音和模拟声音进行了响度、噪声和烦恼的判断。结果表明：(1)“响度”、“噪声”和“烦恼”的概念具有相当不同的含义;各种因素，如刺激的时间模式、频率成分、持续时间和主观意义，促成了这些差异。(2)声音的主观意义的差异可能对判断噪音和烦恼有重要影响。(3)德国人似乎对音量波动更敏感;他们倾向于根据最大音量来判断声音，而日本人则根据能量来判断声音。(4)在交通噪声的情况下，有德国和日本的主题在这三个方面的评价差异不大，因此，它似乎是适当的评价这些声音由LAeq。
Loudness, noisiness and annoyance were judged for 36 stimuli by Japanese and German subjects. In experiment 1, actual noises such as aircraft and road traffic noise were used. In experiment 2, artificial noises were used. Their level patterns were simulated to correspond to the actual sound sources used in experiment 1, and the carrier was pink noise. Absolute magnitude estimation was used for making judgments. Eight German subjects and eight Japanese subjects participated. Judgments of loudness, noisiness and annoyance were made for actual and for simulated sounds. Results showed the following. (1) The concepts “loudness”, “noisiness” and “annoyance” have rather different implications; various factors, such as the temporal pattern of the stimulus, frequency components, duration and subjective meaning, contribute to the differences. (2) Differences in the subjective meaning of sounds may have an important effect on judgments of noisiness and annoyance. (3) German subjects seem to be more sensitive to level fluctuation; they tend to judge sound on the basis of its maximum level, whereas Japanese do so on the basis of its energy. (4) In the case of traffic noise, there was little difference in the evaluation of the three aspects by the German and Japanese subjects; it therefore seems appropriate to evaluate these sounds byLAeq.