Healthcare-based food assistance programmes in the United States: a scoping review and typology.
Healthcare-based food assistance programmes in the United States: a scoping review and typology.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/jns.2023.111
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Greece JA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rudel RK;Byhoff E;Strombotne KL;Drainoni ML;Greece JA
这项范围综述旨在确定美国基于医疗保健的食品援助计划的广度，并将它们整理成一种计划类型学，以便为医疗保健环境中有志于开展食品援助计划的人员提供实施指导。我们在PubMed、Cochrane和CINAHL数据库中搜索了2010年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间发表的经同行评审的文章，并挖掘了参考文献列表。我们使用内容分析从每项干预措施中提取计划细节，并对干预成分进行定性分析，以便为美国的医疗机构制定一种类型学。符合条件的文章包括所服务的患者群体的描述以及计划细节。这些文章不要求包含正式评估才能纳入本次范围综述。我们的搜索得到了8706篇摘要，从中筛选出了来自35项干预措施的43篇文章。我们确定了三种不同的计划类型：直接食品提供、转诊和代金券计划。计划类型受计划目标、后勤考虑因素（如人员配备、食品储存或冷藏空间）以及是否有愿意合作的社区组织（CBO）的影响。食品提供计划（13项）通常是永久性的，并利用与提供食品的社区组织的合作伙伴关系。转诊计划（8项）将患者与社区组织联系起来，以便进行联邦或地方食品援助登记。代金券计划（14项）优先提供水果和蔬菜（10项），并依靠各种诊所工作人员将患者转诊到为期数月的计划。基于医疗保健的实施者可以利用这种类型学来设计和维护符合其场所和患者群体需求的计划。
This scoping review aimed to identify the breadth of healthcare-based food assistance programmes in the United States and organize them into a typology of programmes to provide implementation guidance to aspiring food assistance programmers in healthcare settings. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases for peer-reviewed articles published between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2021, and mined reference lists. We used content analysis to extract programmatic details from each intervention and to qualitatively analyse intervention components to develop a typology for healthcare institutions in the United States. Eligible articles included descriptions of patient populations served and programmatic details. Articles were not required to include formal evaluations for inclusion in this scoping review. Our search resulted in 8706 abstracts, which yielded forty-three articles from thirty-five interventions. We identified three distinct programme types: direct food provision, referral, and voucher programmes. Programme type was influenced by programme goals, logistical considerations, such as staffing, food storage or refrigeration space, and existence of willing partner CBOs. Food provision programmes (n 13) were frequently permanent and leveraged partnerships with community-based organisations (CBOs) that provide food. Referral programmes (n 8) connected patients to CBOs for federal or local food assistance enrollment. Voucher programmes (n 14) prioritised provision of fruits and vegetables (n 10) and relied on a variety of clinic staff to refer patients to months-long programmes. Healthcare-based implementers can use this typology to design and maintain programmes that align with the needs of their sites and patient populations.
DOI：
10.1007/s00520-019-05183-4
发表时间：
2020-08
期刊：
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
影响因子：
--
作者：
Paolantonio L;Kim SY;Ramirez J;Roberts-Eversley N;Li Y;Melnic I;Wu M;Jutagir DR;Smith J;Oladele M;Gany F
通讯作者：
Gany F
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Sastre L;Wynn D;Roupe M;Jacobs M
通讯作者：
Jacobs M