Perceived Discrimination and Incident Cardiovascular Events The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Perceived Discrimination and Incident Cardiovascular Events The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/aje/kwv035
复制
发表时间:
2015-08-01
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Roux, Ana V. Diez
Roux, Ana V. Diez
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Everson-Rose, Susan A.;Lutsey, Pamela L.;Roux, Ana V. Diez

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

感知歧视与心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素呈正相关;其与CVD的关系尚不清楚。使用来自多民族动脉粥样硬化研究的数据,这是一项基于人群的多民族队列研究,共有6508名年龄在45-84岁之间的成年人,他们最初没有临床CVD,我们检查了与CVD事件相关的终身歧视(在6个生活领域遭受不公平待遇的经历)和日常歧视(感知不公平待遇的日常发生频率)。在平均10.1年的随访期间(2000-2011年),共发生604起事件。在调整了种族/民族、社会人口因素、行为和传统心血管疾病危险因素(风险比(HR) = 1.36, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.09, 1.70)和控制了慢性应激和抑郁症状(HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.60)后,报告在>= 2域中存在终生歧视的人(与无歧视的人相比)心血管疾病风险增加。报告的1个域的歧视与CVD无关(HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.30)。没有种族/民族、年龄或性别的差异。相反,日常歧视与性别相互作用(P = 0.03)。分层模型显示,只有男性的风险增加(评分每增加1个标准差,调整后HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.27);控制慢性压力和抑郁症状稍微降低了这种关联(HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.25)。这项研究表明,在中老年人中,感知到的歧视与心血管疾病风险呈负相关。
Perceived discrimination is positively related to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors; its relationship with incident CVD is unknown. Using data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, a population-based multiethnic cohort study of 6,508 adults aged 45-84 years who were initially free of clinical CVD, we examined lifetime discrimination (experiences of unfair treatment in 6 life domains) and everyday discrimination (frequency of day-to-day occurrences of perceived unfair treatment) in relation to incident CVD. During a median 10.1 years of follow-up (2000-2011), 604 incident events occurred. Persons reporting lifetime discrimination in >= 2 domains (versus none) had increased CVD risk, after adjustment for race/ethnicity and sociodemographic factors, behaviors, and traditional CVD risk factors (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09, 1.70) and after control for chronic stress and depressive symptoms (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.60). Reported discrimination in 1 domain was unrelated to CVD (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.30). There were no differences by race/ethnicity, age, or sex. In contrast, everyday discrimination interacted with sex (P = 0.03). Stratified models showed increased risk only among men (for each 1-standard deviation increase in score, adjusted HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.27); controlling for chronic stress and depressive symptoms slightly reduced this association (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.25). This study suggests that perceived discrimination is adversely related to CVD risk in middle-aged and older adults.