"Me versus just us versus us all" categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas.
"Me versus just us versus us all" categorization and cooperation in nested social dilemmas.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.83.3.616
复制
发表时间：
2002-09
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Arjaan Wit;N. Kerr
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Arjaan Wit;N. Kerr
社会困境的一般形式是私人利益与集体利益之间的冲突。然而，人们经常面临私人、（子）群体和集体利益之间的冲突。本研究考察了参与者对这三种嵌套利益的同时权衡。结果表明，增加任何层次的社会分类的显着性（即，6个个体，2个亚组。1集体）增加了参与者对相应兴趣水平的关注和贡献（实验1）。人们可以促进对集体利益的关注和贡献，这是最低的分类为2个亚组，通过个性化的个人自己的子组和/或反对的子组（实验2）的成员，并通过交叉分类与反对的子组（实验3）。
In its generic form, a social dilemma poses a conflict between private and collective interests. People are often faced, however, with a conflict between private, (sub)group, and collective interests. This study examines participants' simultaneous weighing of these 3 nested interests. The results show that increasing the salience of social categorization of any level of the hierarchy (i.e., 6 individuals, 2 subgroups. 1 collective) increases participants' concern for and contributions to the corresponding level of interest (Experiment 1). One can promote concern for and contributions to the collective interest, which are lowest under categorization as 2 subgroups, by individuating the members of the individuals' own subgroup and/or the opposing subgroup (Experiment 2) and by cross-categorization with the opposing subgroup (Experiment 3).