Basic emotion processing and the adolescent brain: Task demands, analytic approaches, and trajectories of changes
Basic emotion processing and the adolescent brain: Task demands, analytic approaches, and trajectories of changes
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.dcn.2016.03.005
复制
发表时间：
2016-06-01
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
MargolinDepartment, Gayla
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
del Piero, Larissa B.;Saxbe, Darby E.;MargolinDepartment, Gayla
早期的神经影像学研究表明，青少年与情绪反应相关的大脑区域初步发育，但与情绪调节相关的大脑结构发育较慢。然而，青少年大脑研究的日益复杂化使这一情况变得更加复杂。这篇综述考察了功能性神经影像学研究，这些研究测试了青少年与儿童或成人之间基本情绪处理（反应性和调节）的差异。我们在回顾的研究中描述了不同实验范式的不同情绪处理需求，以综合不同的结果。还探讨了评估变化的方法（即分析方法）和队列特征（例如年龄范围）作为影响研究结果的潜在因素。很少有统一的维度能够成功地提炼所审查研究的结果。然而，这篇综述强调了研究之间微妙的方法论和分析差异的潜在影响、对标准化和理论驱动的实验范式的需求，以及能够充分测试最近提出的发展变化轨迹的分析方法的必要性。对未来研究的建议强调连通性分析和非线性发展轨迹，这似乎是衡量青春期变化的有前途的方法。提出了评估超越实际年龄的性别和生物发育标志的建议。 (C) 2016 年作者。由 Elsevier Ltd 出版。这是一篇遵循 CC BY-NC-ND 许可的开放获取文章。
Early neuroimaging studies suggested that adolescents show initial development in brain regions linked with emotional reactivity, but slower development in brain structures linked with emotion regulation. However, the increased sophistication of adolescent brain research has made this picture more complex. This review examines functional neuroimaging studies that test for differences in basic emotion processing (reactivity and regulation) between adolescents and either children or adults. We delineated different emotional processing demands across the experimental paradigms in the reviewed studies to synthesize the diverse results. The methods for assessing change (i.e., analytical approach) and cohort characteristics (e.g., age range) were also explored as potential factors influencing study results. Few unifying dimensions were found to successfully distill the results of the reviewed studies. However, this review highlights the potential impact of subtle methodological and analytic differences between studies, need for standardized and theory-driven experimental paradigms, and necessity of analytic approaches that are can adequately test the trajectories of developmental change that have recently been proposed. Recommendations for future research highlight connectivity analyses and non-linear developmental trajectories, which appear to be promising approaches for measuring change across adolescence. Recommendations are made for evaluating gender and biological markers of development beyond chronological age. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.