Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Sepsis A Secondary Analysis of the SMART Clinical Trial
Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Sepsis A Secondary Analysis of the SMART Clinical Trial
复制标题
DOI:
10.1164/rccm.201903-0557oc
复制
发表时间:
2019-12-15
影响因子:
24.7
通讯作者:
Semler, Matthew W.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brown, Ryan M.;Wang, Li;Semler, Matthew W.
Rationale: Administration of intravenous crystalloid solutions is a fundamental therapy for sepsis, but the effect of crystalloid composition on patient outcomes remains unknown.Objectives: To compare the effect of balanced crystalloids versus saline on 30-day in-hospital mortality among critically ill adults with sepsis.Methods: Secondary analysis of patients from SMART (Isotonic Solutions and Major Adverse Renal Events Trial) admitted to the medical ICU with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, Clinical Modification System code for sepsis, using multivariable regression to control for potential confounders.Measurements and Main Results: Of 15,802 patients enrolled in SMART, 1,641 patients were admitted to the medical ICU with a diagnosis of sepsis. A total of 217 patients (26.3%) in the balanced crystalloids group experienced 30-day in-hospital morality compared with 255 patients (31.2%) in the saline group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.93; P = 0.01). Patients in the balanced group experienced a lower incidence of major adverse kidney events within 30 days (35.4% vs. 40.1%; aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.97) and a greater number of vasopressor-free days (20 +/- 12 vs. 19 +/- 13; aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02-1.54) and renal replacement therapy-free days (20 +/- 12 vs. 19 +/- 13; aOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08-1.69) compared with the saline group.Conclusions: Among patients with sepsis in a large randomized trial, use of balanced crystalloids was associated with a lower 30-day in-hospital mortality compared with use of saline.