Non-canonical reading: reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle (2008).
Non-canonical reading: reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle (2008).
复制标题
非规范阅读：回复 Rayner、Pollatsek、Liversedge 和 Reichle (2008)。
DOI：
10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.013
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Kennedy A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kennedy A
Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle offer a spirited critique of our paper (Kennedy & Pynte, 2008). Their argument is that our data were obtained selectively, that the effects reported are not typical of normal reading and, in any case, do not pose particularly severe theoretical problems for serial models of reading like E–Z Reader. In this rebuttal we follow the organisation of their Comment and deal with three issues:(1) the nature of the phenomena;(2) the degree to which these represent a genuine challenge to current models of eye movement control; and (3) the relationship between empirical data and computational models in this domain.
