Maps and memory, rights and relationships: articulations of global modernity and local dwelling in delineating land for a communal-area conservancy in north-west Namibia

Maps and memory, rights and relationships: articulations of global modernity and local dwelling in delineating land for a communal-area conservancy in north-west Namibia
复制标题

地图与记忆、权利与关系:纳米比亚西北部公共区域保护区划定土地时对全球现代性和当地住宅的阐述

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
S. Sullivan
S. Sullivan
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Sullivan

文献摘要

相似文献

绘制新的行政领域以整合保护与发展, 并根据新政策和受其管辖的公民来界定权利, 后殖民时代新自由主义环境治理方案的核心, 自然资源管理(CBNRM)。现在有大量的例子, CBNRM倡议和进程的结果不明确,有时存在争议。在这 我利用纳米比亚西北部的历史、口述历史和人种学材料, 特别是与讲Khoekhoegowab语的土著达马拉/尼加拉瓜Khoen人的关系, ||乌布人,探讨两个问题。首先,我强调历史殖民主义的重要性, 种族隔离背景下产生的土地和人口的映射重组, 超越这些重组的访问和使用的记忆。其次,我提出了一个关系, 与现在作为CBNRM界定的土地的概念、结构和情感关系 行政单位或“保护区”往往被破坏,通过过去的事件 随着经济化的新自由主义治理方法在这一背景下站稳脚跟。 承认人地关系的概念和经验中的脱节, 帮助理解在当代全球化中谁和什么被放大或缩小 新自由主义环境治理的轨迹。特别是,口述历史记录 个人经验的深入,特别是那些老年人促使返回 人们记忆中的过去居住的地方,可以历史化并加深对复杂文化的认识 今天具有很高保护价值的景观。
Mapping new administrative domains for integrating conservation and development, and defining rights in terms of both new policy and the citizenry governed thereby, have been central to postcolonial neoliberal environmental governance programmes known as Community Based Natural Resources Management (CBNRM). Examples now abound of the complex, ambiguous and sometimes contested outcomes of CBNRM initiatives and processes. In this paper I draw on historical, oral history and ethnographic material for north-west Namibia, particularly in relation to indigenous Khoekhoegowab-speaking Damara / ≠Nūkhoen and ||Ubun peoples, to explore two issues. First, I highlight the significance of historical colonial and apartheid contexts generating mapped reorganisations of land and human populations for memories of access and use that exceed these reorganisations. Second, I foreground a nexus of conceptual, constitutive and affective relationships with lands now bounded as CBNRM administrative units or ‘conservancies’ that have tended to be disrupted through both past events and as economising neoliberal governance approaches have taken hold in this context. Acknowledging disjunctions in conceptions and experiences of people-land relationships may assist with understanding who and what is amplified or diminished in contemporary globalising trajectories in neoliberal environmental governance. In particular, oral histories recording individual experiences in-depth, especially those of elderly people prompted by return to remembered places of past dwelling, can historicise and deepen recognition of complex cultural landscapes that today carry high conservation value.