Development and Validation of the Subtypes of Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire
Development and Validation of the Subtypes of Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/ab.20314
复制
发表时间：
2009-09-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Donnellan, M. Brent
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Burt, S. Alexandra;Donnellan, M. Brent
越来越多的证据表明，身体攻击、违反规则和社会攻击构成了反社会行为这一更广泛结构的有意义的不同组成部分，尽管有些重叠。事实上，这些亚型似乎有不同的发展轨迹，人口统计学相关性和人格基础。它们还表现出重要的病因学区别。对这三种类型的反社会行为的相关性和起源积累更多的科学见解的一个潜在限制是缺乏公共领域的有效自我报告评估。我们开发了32项反社会行为问卷（STAB）来填补这一空白。我们的目标是开发一种简单的测量方法，可以可靠有效地评估反社会行为的三种主要亚型中的每一种，并且可以免费提供给其他研究人员。本系列研究提供了初步证据的因素效度，内部一致性，标准相关的STAB量表的效度。简而言之，STAB似乎是一种简短而有用的测量方法，可用于区分和评估身体攻击性，违反规则和社会攻击性形式的反社会行为。Agr.行为举止。35：376-398，2009. (C)2009年威利-利斯。Inc.
There is converging evidence that physical aggression, rule-breaking, and social aggression constitute meaningfully distinct, if somewhat overlapping, components of the broader construct of antisocial behavior. Indeed, these subtypes appear to have different developmental trajectories, demographic correlates, and personological underpinnings. They also demonstrate important etiological distinctions. One potential limitation to accumulating additional scientific insights into the correlates and origins of these three types of antisocial behavior is the lack of an efficient self-report assessment in the public domain. We developed the 32-item Subtypes of Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire (STAB) to fill this gap. Our goal was to develop a brief measure that could reliably and validly assess each of the three major subtypes of antisocial behavior and that would be freely available for other researchers. The present series of studies provides initial evidence of the factorial validity, internal consistency, and criterion-related validity of the STAB scales. In short, it appears that the STAB is a brief and useful measure that can be used to differentiate and assess physically aggressive, rule-breaking, and socially aggressive forms of antisocial behavior. Aggr. Behav. 35:376-398, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss. Inc.