Have We Identified Effective Teachers? Validating Measures of Effective Teaching Using Random Assignment. Research Paper. MET Project.

Have We Identified Effective Teachers? Validating Measures of Effective Teaching Using Random Assignment. Research Paper. MET Project.
复制标题

我们找到了有效的教师吗?

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Staiger
D. Staiger
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Thomas J. Kane;D. McCaffrey;Trey Miller;D. Staiger

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/quickreview.aspx? [2013/2/25 11:54:34 AM]研究的目的是什么?这项研究测试了研究作者创建的一项措施是否可以识别有效提高学生成绩的教师。作者使用2009- 10学年的数据创建了一个单一的教师有效性综合指标;该综合指标包括教师对学生考试成绩的增值估计,教师课堂观察的数据以及学生调查的回应。然后,在接下来的学年(2010-11),作者随机将学生的教室分配给教师(以确保分配给每位教师的学生没有可测量或不可测量的差异),然后在整个学年中跟踪学生的学业进展。作者将学生的实际学业成绩与他们的预期成绩进行了比较,以确定教师有效性衡量标准在多大程度上确定了那些提高学生成绩超过预期成绩的教师。
http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/quickreview.aspx?sid=221[2/25/2013 11:54:34 AM] What is the study about? This study tested whether a measure created by study authors could identify teachers who are effective at increasing student achievement. The authors used 2009– 10 school year data to create a single composite measure of teacher effectiveness; this composite measure included estimates of teacher value-added to student test scores, data from classroom observations of teachers, and responses to student surveys. Then, for the following school year (2010–11), the authors randomly assigned classrooms of students to teachers (to ensure that there were no measured or unmeasured differences in students assigned to each teacher) and then followed the students’ academic progress throughout the school year. The authors compared the students’ actual academic achievement with their predicted achievement to determine how well the teacher effectiveness measure identified teachers who were improving student performance beyond their expected gains.