Educational Program Evaluation System in a Medical School

Educational Program Evaluation System in a Medical School
复制标题

医学院教育项目评价系统

DOI:
10.17496/kmer.2020.22.2.131
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
Korean Medical Education Review
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
S. Im
S. Im
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Yune;Sang Yeoup Lee;S. Im

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

建立系统的教育项目评价体系是医学本科教育质量持续提高的必要条件。监测和评价(M&E)是强调形成目的的评价系统中提到的两个不同但互补的过程。监测包括定期收集数据以跟踪过程和结果,而评估需要定期判断以改进。我们最近在一所医学院完成了一项使用M&E概念的教育评价。评估系统包括两个循环,一个是课程/课程水平,另一个是阶段/毕业水平。我们分计划、监测、评价、改进四个阶段开展评价活动。在策划阶段,我们明确了评估目的,制定了利益相关者参与计划,确定了评估标准和指标,制定了评估方案。接下来,在监测阶段,我们制定了评估工具和方法,然后收集数据。在评价阶段,我们对结果进行了分析,并对两个循环的准则进行了评价。最后,我们与利益相关者一起回顾评估结果,以进行改进。我们已经认识到一些问题,包括负担过重、缺乏专业知识、对利益相关者的评估问题考虑不足以及数据收集效率低下。我们需要分享评价的价值,逐步建立评价体系。
A systematic educational program evaluation system for continuous quality improvement in undergraduate medical education is essential. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are two distinct but complementary processes referred to in an evaluation system that emphasizes formative purpose. Monitoring involves regular data collection for tracking process and results, while evaluation requires periodic judgment for improvement. We have recently completed implementing an educational evaluation using the M&E concept in a medical school. The evaluation system consists of two loops, one at the lesson/course level and the other at the phase/graduation level. We conducted evaluation activities in four stages: planning, monitoring, evaluation, and improvement. In the planning phase, we clarified the purpose of evaluation, formulated a plan to engage stakeholders, determined evaluation criteria and indicators, and developed an evaluation plan. Next, during the monitoring phase, we developed evaluation instruments and methods and then collected data. In the evaluation phase, we analyzed results and evaluated the criteria of the two loops. Finally, we reviewed the evaluation results with stakeholders to make improvements. We have recognized several problems including excessive burden, lack of expertise, insufficient consideration of stakeholders’ evaluation questions, and inefficient data collection. We need to share the value of evaluation and build a system gradually.