Paradigm shift and business as usual through policy layering: Forest-related policy change in Indonesia (1999-2016)
Paradigm shift and business as usual through policy layering: Forest-related policy change in Indonesia (1999-2016)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.021
复制
发表时间：
2019-07-01
期刊：
影响因子：
7.1
通讯作者：
Nurrochmat, Dodik R.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Erbaugh, James T.;Nurrochmat, Dodik R.
尽管印度尼西亚当局承诺减少毁林和森林退化造成的排放，但在印度尼西亚民主的头18年里，印度尼西亚森林覆盖面积的损失一直在增加。为了确定与森林有关的政策是否表现出向森林保护的范式转变，我们确定并编码了1999年至2016年间通过的218份国家森林相关政策文件。我们确定是否发生了与森林有关的政策的范式变化和机制，通过政策引用网络的解释和统计分析与森林有关的政策内容和变化之间的时间关系，随着时间的推移发生变化或没有发生。我们发现，从1999年到2016年，印度尼西亚森林相关政策的数量显著增加，主要包括促进森林保护和重新定义森林相关组织的结构和资金的内容。这些内容的变化主要是在政策分层的过程中发生的，即新政策并不修改或废除旧的政策法规。我们讨论了目前的趋势，在印尼的森林领土和流量的监管，并找到进一步的证据，政策分层。因此，虽然印度尼西亚的森林政策显示出一种范式转变，但制定新政策的分层过程允许有可解释的灵活性，从而使森林覆盖继续丧失。
Despite pledges by Indonesian authorities to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, Indonesian forest cover loss consistently increased over the first 18 years of Indonesian democracy. To determine if forest-related policy demonstrates a paradigm shift toward forest protection, we identify and code a set of 218 national forest-related policy documents passed between 1999 and 2016. We determine whether a paradigmatic change in forest-related policy occurred and the mechanism by which change has or has not taken place through the interpretation of policy citation networks and statistical analysis of temporal relationships between forest related policy content and change over time. We find that there was a significant increase in the amount of Indonesian forest-related policy from 1999 to 2016 and that it was largely comprised of content that promotes forest protection and redefines the structure and funding for forest-related organizations. These content changes primarily occurred through the process of policy layering, when new policy does not amend or repeal old policy and regulation. We discuss current trends in the regulation of forest territory and flow in Indonesia and find further evidence of policy layering. Thus, although Indonesian forest-related policy demonstrates a paradigm shift, the layering process through which new policy was created allows for interpretable flexibility, which enables continued forest cover loss.