Subjective socio-economic status predicts self-rated health irrespective of objective family socio-economic background.
Subjective socio-economic status predicts self-rated health irrespective of objective family socio-economic background.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1403494820926053
复制
发表时间：
2020-11
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Präg P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Präg P
目的：社会经济地位（SES）的主观评价与健康结果密切相关，即使在控制客观SES时也是如此。这是否是因为没有以足够详尽的方式考虑客观的SES？研究方法：我汇集了来自德国的八波具有全国代表性的调查数据（德国综合社会调查，2004 - 18，N = 13，557），以评估SES的两个独立的主观评价（10点量表和主观选择的社会阶层成员）之间的关联和使用logit和线性概率模型的自我评估健康状况不佳。我解释了一个详尽的客观SES变量，包括受访者的家庭收入和社会地位，以及职业地位，社会阶层和教育的受访者和他们的合作伙伴，父亲和母亲。结果如下：主观SES和自我评估的健康状况不佳之间的关联保持稳定，即使考虑到广泛的客观SES标志物。这对于以10分制测量的主观SES和作为主观类别识别都是正确的。结论：即使控制了大量客观SES标志物，主观SES和自评健康状况也是相关的，这表明对SES的主观评估是对SES的有意义的衡量标准，形成了一条独特的健康途径。
Aim: Subjective appraisals of socio-economic status (SES) are robustly associated with health outcomes, even when controlling for objective SES. Is this because objective SES is not accounted for in a sufficiently exhaustive way? Methods: I pool eight waves of nationally representative survey data from Germany (German General Social Survey, 2004–18, N=13,557) to assess the association between two separate subjective appraisals of SES (a 10-point scale and subjectively chosen social class membership) and poor self-rated health using logit and linear probability models. I account for an exhaustive range of objective SES variables, including respondents’ household incomes and social status, as well as occupational status, social class and education of respondents and of their partners, fathers and mothers. Results: The association between subjective SES and poor self-rated health remains stable, even when accounting for a wide range of objective SES markers. This is true for both subjective SES measured on a 10-point scale and as a subjective class identification. Conclusions: Even when controlling for a large number of objective SES markers, subjective SES and self-rated health are linked, suggesting that subjective assessments of SES are meaningful measures of SES which form a distinct pathway to health.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Kraus, Michael W.;Adler, Nancy;Chen, Teh-Way David
通讯作者：
Chen, Teh-Way David
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Prag, Patrick;Subramanian, S. V.
通讯作者：
Subramanian, S. V.
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Cundiff, Jenny M.;Boylan, Jennifer Morozink;Muscatell, Keely A.
通讯作者：
Muscatell, Keely A.
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Prag, Patrick;Richards, Lindsay
通讯作者：
Richards, Lindsay
DOI：
10.1037/hea0000534
发表时间：
2017-12
期刊：
Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association
影响因子：
--
作者：
Cundiff JM;Matthews KA
通讯作者：
Matthews KA