Structures of Social Action: Talk and recipiency: sequential organization in speech and body movement
Structures of Social Action: Talk and recipiency: sequential organization in speech and body movement
复制标题
社会行动的结构：谈话和接受：言语和身体运动的顺序组织
DOI：
10.1017/cbo9780511665868.017
复制
发表时间：
1985
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Heath
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Heath
社会互动要求参与者建立并保持对手头业务或主题的相互参与，并系统地协调他们的行动和活动。然而，参与互动很少被明确提及;如果这样做，就会将注意力的焦点从手头的主题转移到参与互动的问题上，相反，参与者通过他们作为发言者和他人行动的接受者的行为方式来保持参与。在互动活动的过程中，参与者自己确定他们的行动和活动如何被其他参与者接受和参与。正如会话分析中的研究所表明的那样，接收和相关插话工作的一个重要焦点是”下一轮”，即紧接在前一轮之后的话语。它也被发现，一个说话者实际上在一个话语的过程中可能会定向到一个共同参与者（S）的行为，以确定他或她是否以及如何参加正在说什么。在本章中，我希望探讨说话者如何从共同参与者那里引出顺从的表现，以及顺从的表现本身是如何引出的。通过探索接受性和言语之间的关系，我希望能对持续参与社交互动的本质有所了解。1本章来自一项关于社会交往中的非言语交际的研究。这项研究由英国社会科学研究理事会、HR/5148和HR资助。我谨此感谢已故名誉教授PS Byrne和DHH Metcalfe教授对调查的支持，以及所有参与研究项目的人士。
Social interaction requires participants to establish and sustain mutual involvement in the business or topic at hand and to coordinate systematically their actions and activities. Involvement in interaction however is rarely explicitly addressed; if it were it would shift the focus of attention from the topic at hand to the problems of being involved in it. Rather, participants sustain involvement through the ways in which they behave both as speakers and the recipients of the actions of others. Within the course of interactional activity participants themselves orient to how their actions and activities are received and attended to by their fellow participants. As studies within conversation analysis have shown, an important focus for the demonstration of receipt and related interactional work is in" next turn," the utterance immediately following a prior. It is also found that a speaker actually within the course of an utterance may orient to the behavior of a coparticipant (s) in order to determine whether and how he or she is attending to what is being said. In this chapter I wish to explore the way in which a speaker may elicit a display of recipiency from a coparticipant and the way in which a display of recipiency is itself elicitive. By exploring the relationship between recipiency and speech I hope to cast a little light on the nature of sustaining involvement in social interaction. 1This chapter is drawn from a study concerned with nonvocal communication in social interactions. The study was funded by the (British) Social Science Research Council, HR/5148 and HR. I should like to express my gratitude to the late emeritus Professor PS Byrne and Professor DHH Metcalfe for their support in the investigations and all those who cooperated in the research project.