Estimated trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference versus intraocular pressure as biomarker for open-angle glaucoma. The Beijing Eye Study 2011

Estimated trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference versus intraocular pressure as biomarker for open-angle glaucoma. The Beijing Eye Study 2011
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/aos.12480
复制
发表时间:
2015-02-01
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Xu, Liang
Xu, Liang
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jonas, Jost B.;Wang, Ning Li;Xu, Liang

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:探讨估计的筛板压差(TLCPD)优于眼内压(IOP)与青光眼标志物的相关性。方法:2011年以人群为基础的北京眼科研究纳入3468例。脑脊液压(CSFP)计算公式为:CSFP [mmHg] = 0.44 ×体重指数[kg/m(2)] + 0.16 ×舒张压[mmHg] - 0.18 ×年龄[Years] - 1.91。TLCPD为io - csfp。结果:在非青光眼人群中,平均TLCPD为5.8 +/- 4.1 mmHg,平均估计CSFP为8.9 +/- 3.7 mmHg。青光眼组IOP高于非青光眼组(p = 0.008), CSFP低于非青光眼组(p < 0.001), TLCPD高于非青光眼组(p < 0.001)。TLCPD组间差异最大(2.1 mmHg),其次是CSFP (1.7 mmHg)和IOP (0.4 mmHg)。开角型青光眼(OAG)与TLCPD升高相关[p < 0.001;优势比(OR): 1.14;95%可信区间(CI): 1.08, 1.19]但与IOP无关(p = 0.22; OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.03)。相比之下,在调整年龄和前房深度后,闭角型青光眼(ACG)与较高的IOP相关(p = 0.03; B: 0.14; OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.30),但与TLCPD无关(p = 0.98)。经性别、年龄、居住地、视盘面积和屈光不正校正后,视网膜神经纤维层厚度与较低的TLCPD相关(p = 0.036),而与IOP无关(p = 0.96)。在调整性别、视盘面积和屈光不正后,神经视网膜面积和体积与较小的TLCPD相关(p = 0.002, p < 0.001),但与IOP无关(p = 0.43和p = 0.25,分别)。结论:在OAG中,而在ACG中,计算的TLCPD与IOP与青光眼的存在和青光眼视神经病变的数量有更好的关联。这支持了低cfp在OAG发病机制中的潜在作用。
Purpose: To examine whether an estimated trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) better than intraocular pressure (IOP) correlated with markers for glaucoma.Methods: The population-based Beijing Eye Study 2011 included 3468 individuals. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) was calculated as CSFP [mmHg] = 0.44 x Body Mass Index [kg/m(2)] + 0.16 x Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg] - 0.18 x Age [Years] - 1.91. TLCPD was IOP-CSFP.Results: In the non-glaucomatous population, mean TLCPD was 5.8 +/- 4.1 mmHg and mean estimated CSFP was 8.9 +/- 3.7 mmHg. IOP was higher (p = 0.008), CSFP was lower (p < 0.001), and TLCPD was (p < 0.001) higher in the glaucoma group than in the non-glaucomatous group. The intergroup difference was highest for TLCPD (2.1 mmHg) followed by CSFP (1.7 mmHg) and IOP (0.4 mmHg). Open-angle glaucoma (OAG) was associated with higher TLCPD [p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 1.14; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.08, 1.19] but not with IOP (p = 0.22; OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.03). In contrast, angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) was associated with higher IOP (p = 0.03; B: 0.14; OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.30) but not with TLCPD (p = 0.98), after adjustment for age and anterior chamber depth. Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness was associated with lower TLCPD (p = 0.036) but not with IOP (p = 0.96), after adjusting for gender, age, region of habitation, optic disc area and refractive error. Neuroretinal area and volume were associated with smaller TLCPD (p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively), after adjusting for gender, optic disc area and refractive error, but not with IOP (p = 0.43 and p = 0.25, resp.).Conclusions: In OAG, but not in ACG, calculated TLCPD versus IOP showed a better association with glaucoma presence and amount of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. It supports the notion of a potential role of low CSFP in the pathogenesis of OAG.