The Sanctions Glass: Half Full or Completely Empty?
The Sanctions Glass: Half Full or Completely Empty?
复制标题
制裁玻璃杯:半满还是全空?
DOI:
10.1162/isec.23.1.50
复制
发表时间:
1998
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
K. Elliott
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
K. Elliott
~ I n “Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work,”’ Robert Pape sets up a straw man and then boldly proceeds to knock it down. His target is an “emerging optimism” about sanctions, which in his oversimplified characterization says that economic sanctions-used in isolation from other tools-are ”as effective as military force and more humane” (p. 90). But policy analysts-and certainly policymakerswho are looking for ways to strengthen sanctions and make them more effective are generally far more nuanced in their conclusions and more limited in their expectations of what sanctions can achieve than Pape asserts. And in the wake of the experiences in Iraq and Haiti, few suggest that economic sanctions are necessarily more humane or that their use can be justified regardless of the humanitarian consequences. While my disagreements with Pape’s methods are many, the Hufbauer, Schott, and Elliott (hereafter HSE) bottom line on the utility of economic sanctions is not terribly different.2 Although Pape cites our work as the “key evidence’’ supporting the perceived optimism that sanctions can achieve major foreign policy goals, he never cites our own interpretation of the evidence. We concluded that ”although it is not true that sanctions ’never work,’ they are of limited utility in achieving foreign policy goals that depend on compelling the target country to take actions it stoutly resists. . . . The success rate importantly depends on the type of policy or governmental change sought” (HSE 2d ed., vol. 1, pp. 92-93). Moreover, we found that the utility of sanctions had declined