Architectural Tactics for Big Data Cybersecurity Analytic Systems: A Review

Architectural Tactics for Big Data Cybersecurity Analytic Systems: A Review
复制标题

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2018-02
期刊:
ArXiv
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Faheem Ullah;M. Babar
Faheem Ullah;M. Babar
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Faheem Ullah;M. Babar

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:大数据网络安全分析旨在通过使用大数据工具和技术分析安全事件数据来保护网络、计算机和数据免受未经授权的访问。虽然文献中报道了大量的大数据网络安全分析系统,但缺乏从架构角度对文献进行系统和全面的回顾。目标:本文报告了一项系统回顾,旨在确定大数据网络安全分析系统最常报告的质量属性和架构策略。方法:我们使用系统文献综述(SLR)方法回顾了根据明确标准选择的 74 项初步研究。结果:我们的发现有两个方面:(i) 识别 12 个最常报告的质量属性,并证明它们对大数据网络安全分析系统的重要性; (ii) 识别和编纂 17 种架构策略,用于解决通常与大数据网络安全分析系统相关的质量属性。确定的策略包括六种性能策略、四种准确性策略、两种可扩展性策略、三种可靠性策略以及一种安全性和可用性策略。结论:我们的研究结果表明:(a)尽管互操作性、可修改性、适应性、通用性、隐秘性和隐私保证具有重要意义,但这些质量属性在文献中缺乏明确的架构支持(b)需要进行实证调查来评估编码架构策略的影响(c)应投入大量研究工作来探索已识别策略之间的权衡和依赖关系,以及(d)学术界和工业界普遍缺乏支持大数据网络安全领域的有效合作分析系统。
Context: Big Data Cybersecurity Analytics is aimed at protecting networks, computers, and data from unauthorized access by analysing security event data using big data tools and technologies. Whilst a plethora of Big Data Cybersecurity Analytic Systems have been reported in the literature, there is a lack of a systematic and comprehensive review of the literature from an architectural perspective. Objective: This paper reports a systematic review aimed at identifying the most frequently reported quality attributes and architectural tactics for Big Data Cybersecurity Analytic Systems. Method: We used Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method for reviewing 74 primary studies selected using well-defined criteria. Results: Our findings are twofold: (i) identification of 12 most frequently reported quality attributes and the justification for their significance for Big Data Cybersecurity Analytic Systems; and (ii) identification and codification of 17 architectural tactics for addressing the quality attributes that are commonly associated with Big Data Cybersecurity Analytic systems. The identified tactics include six performance tactics, four accuracy tactics, two scalability tactics, three reliability tactics, and one security and usability tactic each. Conclusion: Our findings have revealed that (a) despite the significance of interoperability, modifiability, adaptability, generality, stealthiness, and privacy assurance, these quality attributes lack explicit architectural support in the literature (b) empirical investigation is required to evaluate the impact of codified architectural tactics (c) a good deal of research effort should be invested to explore the trade-offs and dependencies among the identified tactics and (d) there is a general lack of effective collaboration between academia and industry for supporting the field of Big Data Cybersecurity Analytic Systems.