Issues in dimensional structure of affect--Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comment on Russell and Carroll (1999).
Issues in dimensional structure of affect--Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comment on Russell and Carroll (1999).
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.601
复制
发表时间：
1999-09
影响因子：
22.4
通讯作者：
D. Watson;A. Tellegen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Watson;A. Tellegen
在他们的文章”论积极和消极情感的双极性”中，JA Russell和JM卡罗尔（1999;参见记录1998-03256-001）正确地指出，几个因素-包括使用严格的单极项目反应格式-可以掩盖某些积极和消极情感对的潜在双极性。然而，他们的其他一些结论需要澄清。首先，即使在用单极格式获得的未校正数据中，双极性也是明显的。第二，多元相关性和适当的项目分析模型可以规避可能与单极量表相关的问题;因此，在情感评估中使用双极格式是不必要的（也是不可取的）。第三，没有证据支持他们的主张，即一般情绪评级不如其他长期影响的测量有效。最后，他们的环形模型的各个方面没有得到数据的很好支持;取而代之的是，作者提出了一个更具包容性的3级层次结构。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
In their article" On the Bipolarity of Positive and Negative Affect," JA Russell and JM Carroll (1999; see record 1998-03256-001) correctly noted that several factors—including the use of a strictly unipolar item response format—can obscure the underlying bipolarity of certain positive and negative affect pairs. However, some of their other conclusions require clarification. First, bipolarity is evident even in uncorrected data obtained with unipolar formats. Second, polychoric correlations and appropriate item-analytic models can circumvent problems that may be associated with unipolar scales; consequently, it is unnecessary (and undesirable) to use bipolar formats in affect assessment. Third, no evidence supports their claim that general mood ratings are less valid than other measures of long-term affect. Finally, aspects of their circumplex model are not well supported by the data; in its place, the authors suggest a more inclusive 3-level hierarchical structure.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)