Constructions in Grammaticalization
Constructions in Grammaticalization
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/9780470756393.ch20
复制
发表时间:
2008-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
E. Traugott
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
E. Traugott
A standard definition of grammaticalization is that it is the process whereby lexemes or lexical items become grammatical.1Yet the equally standard examples of the process, such as body part terms becoming adpositions (e.g.,by (X's) side), or motion verbs becoming auxiliaries (e.g.,be going to >“future”gonna), typically involve not bare lexemes but morphosyntactic strings, or in most cases more properly constructions. While the focus of most definitions of grammaticalization in the linguistic literature has been on lexemes (and, in later stages, the grammaticalization of already grammatical items into more grammatical ones, e.g., auxiliary verbs into affixes), increasing attention has recently been paid to the fact that early in grammaticalization, lexemes grammaticalize only in certain highly specifiable morphosyntactic contexts, and under specifiable pragmatic conditions. This concept of grammaticalization as a fundamentally relational and context‐dependent process has its origins in Meillet's work, and is therefore in no way new. However, the research agendas of practitioners of grammaticalization theory have developed in rather different ways depending in part on whether the focus is on lexemes or on the contexts in which they take on grammatical functions. The present chapter explores some of the consequences of thinking about grammaticalization when the starting‐point is “the observation that grammatical morphemes develop gradually out of … combinations of lexical morphemes with lexical or grammatical morphemes”, and when context is highlighted.