Development and Validation of the Nursing Home Minimum Data Set 3.0 Mortality Risk Score (MRS3)

Development and Validation of the Nursing Home Minimum Data Set 3.0 Mortality Risk Score (MRS3)
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/gerona/gly044
复制
发表时间:
2019-02-01
影响因子:
5.1
通讯作者:
Mor, Vincent
Mor, Vincent
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Thomas, Kali S.;Ogarek, Jessica A.;Mor, Vincent

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

使用最小数据集3.0开发一个评分来预测死亡率(MDS 3.0),可以很容易地计算出从项目收集在疗养院(NH)居民的入院评估。参与者我们开发了一个培训队列的医疗保险受益人新承认美国NH在2012年(N = 1,426,815)和2013年的测试队列(N = 1,160,964)。方法数据来自与Medicare Beneficiary Summary File相关的MDS 3.0评估。使用训练数据集,我们开发了一个复合MDS 3.0死亡风险评分(MRS 3),包括17个临床项目和患者的年龄组,基于它们与30天死亡率的关系。我们评估的校准和歧视的MRS 3预测30和60天的死亡率,并比较其性能的Charlson合并症指数和临床医生的评估,6个月的预后测量admission.Results的30和60天的死亡率为测试人群分别为2.8%和5.6%,分别。逻辑回归模型的结果表明,MRS 3在预测30天和60天内的死亡方面表现良好(C-统计量分别为0.744 [95%置信限(CL)= 0.741,0.747]和0.709 [95% CL = 0.706,0.711])。与Charlson合并症指数相比,MRS 3是死亡率的上级预测因子(C-统计量为0.611 [95% CL = 0.607,0.615]和0.608 [95% CL = 0.605,0.610])和临床医生对患者6个月随访的评估结论MRS 3是一个很好的预测死亡率的指标,可用于指导决策、制定护理计划和调整患者的死亡风险。
Background To develop a score to predict mortality using the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0) that can be readily calculated from items collected during nursing home (NH) residents' admission assessments.Participants We developed a training cohort of Medicare beneficiaries newly admitted to United States NHs during 2012 (N = 1,426,815) and a testing cohort from 2013 (N = 1,160,964).Methods Data came from the MDS 3.0 assessments linked to the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File. Using the training dataset, we developed a composite MDS 3.0 Mortality Risk Score (MRS3) consisting of 17 clinical items and patients' age groups based on their relation to 30-day mortality. We assessed the calibration and discrimination of the MRS3 in predicting 30- and 60-day mortality and compared its performance to the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the clinician's assessment of 6-month prognosis measured at admission.Results The 30- and 60-day mortality rates for the testing population were 2.8% and 5.6%, respectively. Results from logistic regression models suggest that the MRS3 performed well in predicting death within 30 and 60 days (C-Statistics of 0.744 [95% confidence limit (CL) = 0.741, 0.747] and 0.709 [95% CL = 0.706, 0.711], respectively). The MRS3 was a superior predictor of mortality compared to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (C-statistics of 0.611 [95% CL = 0.607, 0.615] and 0.608 [95% CL = 0.605, 0.610]) and the clinicians' assessments of patients' 6-month prognoses (C-statistics of 0.543 [95% CL = 0.542, 0.545] and 0.528 [95% CL = 0.527, 0.529]).Conclusions The MRS3 is a good predictor of mortality and can be useful in guiding decision-making, informing plans of care, and adjusting for patients' risk of mortality.