Evaluation of Emergency Response Measures for the LOCA of A Marine Reactor
Evaluation of Emergency Response Measures for the LOCA of A Marine Reactor
复制标题
船用反应堆LOCA应急响应措施评价
DOI：
10.3390/su142113873
复制
发表时间：
2022-10
期刊：
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Shuliang Zou
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yang Zou;Fang Zhao;Shoulong Xu;Shuliang Zou
通过研究时间、通风速度和泄漏速度对某船用反应堆失水事故辐射后果的影响，建立了核事故应急响应技术指标体系，并进行了综合评价。采用层次分析法计算各指标的权重，辐射防护措施在二级指标应急措施中的权重为0.625，占比最大。提高室内放射性核素探测技术、提高探测能力和提高辐射损伤诊断效率在三级指标应急措施中的权重分别为0.4442、0.4384和0.4521，所占比重最大。运用模糊综合评价法对应急措施指标体系进行量化和综合评价。定量评价结果为82.8分，表明评价结果充分。因此，基于反应堆失水事故辐射后果的核应急响应措施是合理可行的。为船用反应堆失水事故的应急响应提供了有价值的措施和实践指导，大大降低了辐射对人员和环境的危害。
In this study, a technical index system for nuclear accident emergency response measures was established and comprehensively evaluated by studying the impact of time, ventilation speed, and leakage speed on the radiation consequences after a loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in a marine reactor. The weight of each index was calculated by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the weight of the radiation protection measure in the second-level index emergency measure was 0.625, accounting for the maximum proportion. The weights of improving radionuclide detection technology in chambers, improving detection capability, and improving the diagnosis efficiency of radiation damage in the three-level indicator emergency measures were 0.4442, 0.4384, and 0.4521, respectively, accounting for the maximum proportions. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to quantify and comprehensively evaluate the index system of emergency measures. The quantitative evaluation result was 82.8 points, indicating that the evaluation result was adequate. Therefore, the nuclear emergency response measure based on the radiation consequences of a marine reactor LOCA is reasonable and feasible. It provides valuable measures and practical guidance for the emergency response of a marine reactor LOCA, and dramatically reduces the harm of radiation to staff and the environment.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.1
作者：
Z. Fang;Zou Shu-liang;L. Zejun;Xi Tao;Xu Shoulong;Huang Yan;Feng Jinjun
通讯作者：
Z. Fang;Zou Shu-liang;L. Zejun;Xi Tao;Xu Shoulong;Huang Yan;Feng Jinjun
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-319-60595-1_4
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
F. Maggino
通讯作者：
F. Maggino
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Fang-Jie Zhao;Shu-liang Zou;Shoulong Xu;Xuan Wang;Jia-ling Wang;D. Tang
通讯作者：
Fang-Jie Zhao;Shu-liang Zou;Shoulong Xu;Xuan Wang;Jia-ling Wang;D. Tang
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Fang Zhao;Shuliang Zou;Shoulong Xu;Junlong Wang;Tao Xu;D. Tang
通讯作者：
Fang Zhao;Shuliang Zou;Shoulong Xu;Junlong Wang;Tao Xu;D. Tang
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Emma K. Redfoot;K. Verner;R. Borrelli
通讯作者：
Emma K. Redfoot;K. Verner;R. Borrelli